On the Prediction of Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions Within a Data‐Driven Framework

Abstract Aerosol‐cloud interactions (ACI) pose the largest uncertainty for climate projection. Among many challenges of understanding ACI, the question of whether ACI can be deterministically predicted has not been explicitly answered. Here we attempt to answer this question by predicting cloud droplet number concentration from aerosol number concentration and ambient conditions using a data‐driven framework. We use aerosol properties, vertical velocity fluctuations, and meteorological states from the ACTIVATE field observations (2020–2022) as predictors to estimate . We show that the campaign‐wide can be successfully predicted using machine learning models despite the strongly nonlinear and multi‐scale nature of ACI. However, the observation‐trained machine learning model fails to predict in individual cases while it successfully predicts of randomly selected data points that cover a broad spatiotemporal scale. This suggests that, within a data‐driven framework, the prediction is uncertain at fine spatiotemporal scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl110757
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Prediction of Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions Within a Data‐Driven Framework

Emma Yuan, K. L. Thornhill, TC Chakraborty, Armin Sorooshian et al.
5 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
1.41
article

On the Prediction of Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions Within a Data‐Driven Framework

Emma Yuan, K. L. Thornhill, TC Chakraborty, Armin Sorooshian, Christiane Voigt, Luke D. Ziemba, Hailong Wang, Xiangyu Li
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aerosol‐cloud interactions (ACI) pose the largest uncertainty for climate projection. Among many challenges of understanding ACI, the question of whether ACI can be deterministically predicted has not been explicitly answered. Here we attempt to answer this question by predicting cloud droplet number concentration from aerosol number concentration and ambient conditions using a data‐driven framework. We use aerosol properties, vertical velocity fluctuations, and meteorological states from the ACTIVATE field observations (2020–2022) as predictors to estimate . We show that the campaign‐wide can be successfully predicted using machine learning models despite the strongly nonlinear and multi‐scale nature of ACI. However, the observation‐trained machine learning model fails to predict in individual cases while it successfully predicts of randomly selected data points that cover a broad spatiotemporal scale. This suggests that, within a data‐driven framework, the prediction is uncertain at fine spatiotemporal scales.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 51(24)
Langley Research Center (US), University of Arizona (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Richland School District Two (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Battelle, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.