“Enervare atque pervertere verba illa Christi Matthaei 11”: Arguing over Matthew 11:21–22 in Luis de Molina’s (1535–1600) <i>Concordia</i> and Leonardus Lessius’ <i>De gratia efficaci</i>

Abstract In the second half of the sixteenth century, the Jesuits Luis de Molina (1535–1600) and Leonardus Lessius (1554–1623) had been forced to defend their views on grace, free will and predestination against multiple attacks by fellow Catholic theologians. By comparing Molina’s commentaries on Matt 11:21–22 in his Concordia of 1595 with Lessius’ remarks on the same verses in his De gratia efficaci (1610), this contribution seeks to provide insights into the extent to which the theological views of both Jesuits differed. The article concludes that Lessius’ theological view diverges from Molina’s where it concerns the physical workings of grace. Furthermore, the two Jesuits differ on the question whether God grants equal aid to all or bestows some with more aid than others. Molina held the latter view, while Lessius, in keeping with the ideas of Henry of Ghent, defended the former.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jemc-2024-2017
Primary Topic
Theology and Canon Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Enervare atque pervertere verba illa Christi Matthaei 11”: Arguing over Matthew 11:21–22 in Luis de Molina’s (1535–1600) Concordia and Leonardus Lessius’ De gratia efficaci

Niels de Bruijn
Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Theology and Canon Law Studies
article

“Enervare atque pervertere verba illa Christi Matthaei 11”: Arguing over Matthew 11:21–22 in Luis de Molina’s (1535–1600) Concordia and Leonardus Lessius’ De gratia efficaci

Niels de Bruijn
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the second half of the sixteenth century, the Jesuits Luis de Molina (1535–1600) and Leonardus Lessius (1554–1623) had been forced to defend their views on grace, free will and predestination against multiple attacks by fellow Catholic theologians. By comparing Molina’s commentaries on Matt 11:21–22 in his Concordia of 1595 with Lessius’ remarks on the same verses in his De gratia efficaci (1610), this contribution seeks to provide insights into the extent to which the theological views of both Jesuits differed. The article concludes that Lessius’ theological view diverges from Molina’s where it concerns the physical workings of grace. Furthermore, the two Jesuits differ on the question whether God grants equal aid to all or bestows some with more aid than others. Molina held the latter view, while Lessius, in keeping with the ideas of Henry of Ghent, defended the former.

Journal of Early Modern ChristianityVol. 11(2)
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Theology and Canon Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.