The Turn to Interiority in the Early Modern Period

Abstract The spirituality of the Early Modern Period – and especially in the Devotio Moderna and Ignatius of Loyola – is often associated with a turn to “interiority.” The question is then: to what does one turn? The Pro Theologia Mystica Clavis (1640) of Maximilianus Sandaeus offers a useful hermeneutical principle. In his explanations of the nature of interiority, he emphasized that it is fundamentally a “turning to the Other,” to God, which strips the human person of its own images and forms. This “turn inwards” is a response to the initiative of God, who is present in the “ground” of the soul, and is thus more present to the human person than the human person is to himself. This “ground” is not the “self” as such, but the fundamental relationality. Interiority concerns the encounter and the deepening relationship between the human person and God, and thus indirectly the human person as a “person” and not the “self” of the individual. This perspective has older roots, as it can be seen, e.g., in the discussion between Peter Abelard and William of Saint-Thierry in the twelfth century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jemc-2024-2011
Primary Topic
Historical Art and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Turn to Interiority in the Early Modern Period

Rob Faesen
Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Historical Art and Culture Studies
article

The Turn to Interiority in the Early Modern Period

Rob Faesen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The spirituality of the Early Modern Period – and especially in the Devotio Moderna and Ignatius of Loyola – is often associated with a turn to “interiority.” The question is then: to what does one turn? The Pro Theologia Mystica Clavis (1640) of Maximilianus Sandaeus offers a useful hermeneutical principle. In his explanations of the nature of interiority, he emphasized that it is fundamentally a “turning to the Other,” to God, which strips the human person of its own images and forms. This “turn inwards” is a response to the initiative of God, who is present in the “ground” of the soul, and is thus more present to the human person than the human person is to himself. This “ground” is not the “self” as such, but the fundamental relationality. Interiority concerns the encounter and the deepening relationship between the human person and God, and thus indirectly the human person as a “person” and not the “self” of the individual. This perspective has older roots, as it can be seen, e.g., in the discussion between Peter Abelard and William of Saint-Thierry in the twelfth century.

Journal of Early Modern ChristianityVol. 11(2)
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Historical Art and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Turn to Interiority in the Early Modern Period — Rob Faesen · Journal of Early Modern Christianity (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS