Cognitive Errors as Predictors of Mental Health Problems in Adolescents

This study aimed to explore the relationship between specific cognitive errors—catastrophizing, overgeneralization, and personalization—and mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and stress, among adolescents. Additionally, the study sought to investigate gender differences in how these cognitive errors contribute to mental health problems. A quantitative, correlational research design was used, involving a sample of 600 adolescents aged 12-18 years. Standardized instruments, such as the Cognitive Errors Scale (CES), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), were employed to assess cognitive errors and mental health symptoms. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and t-tests used to evaluate relationships and gender differences. The findings revealed significant positive associations between cognitive errors and mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, and stress. Additionally, gender differences were observed, with girls reporting higher levels of cognitive errors and more severe mental health distress compared to boys. This study contributes to the literature by offering a deeper understanding of the impact of cognitive errors on adolescent mental health and emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive interventions. The findings are significant for developing targeted therapeutic strategies that address cognitive distortions, ultimately promoting better mental health outcomes for adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i3.2559
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Errors as Predictors of Mental Health Problems in Adolescents

Anzalna Bashir, Sadia Saleem, Hafiza Arooba Javed
Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Cognitive Errors as Predictors of Mental Health Problems in Adolescents

Anzalna Bashir, Sadia Saleem, Hafiza Arooba Javed
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between specific cognitive errors—catastrophizing, overgeneralization, and personalization—and mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and stress, among adolescents. Additionally, the study sought to investigate gender differences in how these cognitive errors contribute to mental health problems. A quantitative, correlational research design was used, involving a sample of 600 adolescents aged 12-18 years. Standardized instruments, such as the Cognitive Errors Scale (CES), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), were employed to assess cognitive errors and mental health symptoms. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and t-tests used to evaluate relationships and gender differences. The findings revealed significant positive associations between cognitive errors and mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, and stress. Additionally, gender differences were observed, with girls reporting higher levels of cognitive errors and more severe mental health distress compared to boys. This study contributes to the literature by offering a deeper understanding of the impact of cognitive errors on adolescent mental health and emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive interventions. The findings are significant for developing targeted therapeutic strategies that address cognitive distortions, ultimately promoting better mental health outcomes for adolescents.

Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 12(3)
Government College University, Lahore (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.