Cycling Isokinetic Peak Force Explains Maximal Aerobic Power and Physiological Thresholds but Not Cycling Economy in Trained Triathletes

<b>Background</b>: Assessments of muscle strength help prescribe and monitor training loads in cyclists (e.g., triathletes). Some methods include repetition maximum, joint isokinetic tests, and indirect estimates. However, their specificity for cycling's dynamic force application and competitive cadences is lacking. This study aims to determine the influence of the cycling isokinetic peak force (cIPF) at different cadences on aerobic performance-related variables in trained triathletes. <b>Methods</b>: Eleven trained male athletes (33 ± 9.8 years, 173.1 ± 5.0 cm height, 73.9 ± 6.8 kg body mass, and ≥5 years of triathlon experience) were recruited. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO₂ max), ventilatory thresholds (i.e., VT1 and VT2), and cIPF were assessed. cIPF testing involved 10 s sprints at varied cadences with 4 min rest intervals. Pedaling cadences were set at low (60 rpm), moderate (80 and 100 rpm), and high (120 and 140 rpm) cadences. A regression model approach identified cIPF related to aerobic performance. <b>Results</b>: IPF at 80 and 120 rpm explained 49% of the variability in power output at VT1, 55% of the variability in power output at VT2, 65% of the variability in power output at maximal aerobic power (MAP), and 39% of the variability in VO₂ max. The cycling economy was not explained by cIPF. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study highlights the significance of cIPF, particularly at moderate to high cadences, as a determinant of aerobic-related variables in trained triathletes. Cycling cIPF should be tested to understand an athlete's profile during crank cycling, informing better practice for training specificity and ultimately supporting athletes in achieving optimal performance outcomes in competitive cycling events.