“We Are the Bridge.” A Qualitative Approach to Compare Value Perceptions of Rehabilitation Therapists in the Academic Medical Center

Introduction and Review of Literature: Rehabilitation therapists contribute to academic medical center (AMC) teams. However, their self-perceptions of the value they add in the AMC have not been fully explored, which may contribute to misunderstandings about their role in the AMC. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare rehabilitation therapists’ perceived value in the AMC from the viewpoints of rehabilitation therapists and non-rehabilitation therapists (NRTs). Subjects: A convenience sample of 25 rehabilitation therapists and 16 NRTs participated in this study. Methods: Participants were recruited via email to answer a survey including demographic data and an invitation to participate in a focus group. Therapist participants were also surveyed about their perceived value. Survey data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Focus groups were conducted virtually, and data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Coding was performed iteratively until the researchers derived the themes and subthemes. Results: Quantitative data indicated that rehabilitation therapists believed they were more valued by fellow therapists than NRTs. Qualitative themes from the therapists were: (1) value in our unique professional role, (2) misunderstandings of the professional role, (3) lack of respect about what we contribute, and (4) bridging the gaps between the patient and caregivers with the rest of the interprofessional team. NRTs’ themes were: (1) role of the therapist, (2) therapy as a resource, and (3) value to patients and NRTs. Discussion and Conclusions: Data demonstrated differences in therapists’ and NRTs’ perceptions of value and guided opportunities for AMC leaders to improve interprofessional communication and collaboration to influence a positive culture shift. A deeper understanding of rehabilitation therapists’ value could enhance therapists’ professional identity and their interprofessional interactions in the AMC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000248
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We Are the Bridge.” A Qualitative Approach to Compare Value Perceptions of Rehabilitation Therapists in the Academic Medical Center

Cara Felter, Diana Johnson, Chris Wells, R Keys et al.
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

“We Are the Bridge.” A Qualitative Approach to Compare Value Perceptions of Rehabilitation Therapists in the Academic Medical Center

Cara Felter, Diana Johnson, Chris Wells, R Keys, Diana Kim, Emily Garguilo, Emmy Saathoff
article en

Abstract

Introduction and Review of Literature: Rehabilitation therapists contribute to academic medical center (AMC) teams. However, their self-perceptions of the value they add in the AMC have not been fully explored, which may contribute to misunderstandings about their role in the AMC. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare rehabilitation therapists’ perceived value in the AMC from the viewpoints of rehabilitation therapists and non-rehabilitation therapists (NRTs). Subjects: A convenience sample of 25 rehabilitation therapists and 16 NRTs participated in this study. Methods: Participants were recruited via email to answer a survey including demographic data and an invitation to participate in a focus group. Therapist participants were also surveyed about their perceived value. Survey data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Focus groups were conducted virtually, and data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Coding was performed iteratively until the researchers derived the themes and subthemes. Results: Quantitative data indicated that rehabilitation therapists believed they were more valued by fellow therapists than NRTs. Qualitative themes from the therapists were: (1) value in our unique professional role, (2) misunderstandings of the professional role, (3) lack of respect about what we contribute, and (4) bridging the gaps between the patient and caregivers with the rest of the interprofessional team. NRTs’ themes were: (1) role of the therapist, (2) therapy as a resource, and (3) value to patients and NRTs. Discussion and Conclusions: Data demonstrated differences in therapists’ and NRTs’ perceptions of value and guided opportunities for AMC leaders to improve interprofessional communication and collaboration to influence a positive culture shift. A deeper understanding of rehabilitation therapists’ value could enhance therapists’ professional identity and their interprofessional interactions in the AMC.

Journal of Acute Care Physical TherapyVol. 16(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), University of Maryland Medical System (US), Partners In Care (US), GlaxoSmithKline (India) (IN), University of Maryland Extension (US), State Key Laboratory of Cryptology (CN), Clinical Solutions (US), Public Works (GB), AIL Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.