There are no words

This study partially remedies the neglect in current Translation Studies research on artistic or invented languages, and interlinguistics more broadly. The work investigates the drama of translatorial sense-making, and how radical difference is encoded as (mis)translation phenomena in many literary works. I consider limit cases (asemia, glyptolalia, pataphilology) and scrutinize the apparent untranslatability posed by others (musical or pictographic languages), and even entertain works translated into diagrammatic images or “ekphrastic translations”. However, the “cryptographic-translation idea” of languages as mutually decodable makes for pseudo-invented languages in those cases in which a posteriori constructed languages are in fact existing natural languages in disguise. At bottom, the study is a meditation on how invented languages are used in transfiction. To name but four functions: 1) as a poetics of defamiliarization of the everyday, 2) as a vehicle of ideological ends (e.g. preventing understanding), 3) as parody (for example, of academic discourse), and 4) as metacommentary on translation. Embracing translation as multi-sensorial, multimodal, and interrelational between form, sound, and text, and works actively or ostensibly defying or transcending translation, I utilize illustrative microcases from linguistic fantasies (linguistic fiction), parables, poetry, concrete poetry, and text-based art.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
STRIDON Studies in Translation and Interpreting
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/stridon.4.2.29-54
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

There are no words

Kelly Washbourne
STRIDON Studies in Translation and Interpreting
Translation Studies and Practices
article

There are no words

Kelly Washbourne
article en

Abstract

This study partially remedies the neglect in current Translation Studies research on artistic or invented languages, and interlinguistics more broadly. The work investigates the drama of translatorial sense-making, and how radical difference is encoded as (mis)translation phenomena in many literary works. I consider limit cases (asemia, glyptolalia, pataphilology) and scrutinize the apparent untranslatability posed by others (musical or pictographic languages), and even entertain works translated into diagrammatic images or “ekphrastic translations”. However, the “cryptographic-translation idea” of languages as mutually decodable makes for pseudo-invented languages in those cases in which a posteriori constructed languages are in fact existing natural languages in disguise. At bottom, the study is a meditation on how invented languages are used in transfiction. To name but four functions: 1) as a poetics of defamiliarization of the everyday, 2) as a vehicle of ideological ends (e.g. preventing understanding), 3) as parody (for example, of academic discourse), and 4) as metacommentary on translation. Embracing translation as multi-sensorial, multimodal, and interrelational between form, sound, and text, and works actively or ostensibly defying or transcending translation, I utilize illustrative microcases from linguistic fantasies (linguistic fiction), parables, poetry, concrete poetry, and text-based art.

STRIDON Studies in Translation and InterpretingVol. 4(2)
Kent State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.