The Causation of Design Error in the Construction Industry: A Multistakeholder Perspective

A seemingly minor design error can have significant repercussions in a construction project, leading to serious safety and quality consequences, cost overrun, and delays. This error can have a lasting impact, potentially affecting usability and safety during the operational stage of the completed facility. Despite these consequences, there is limited research on which stakeholders contribute more significantly to design errors. Furthermore, there is a disconnection in understanding among stakeholders about the causes of design errors. To address the knowledge gap, this research aimed to identify the critical causes of design errors from a multistakeholder perspective. Empirical survey data were collected from 243 design professionals (e.g., architects, structural designers, and water supply and drainage designers) across various stakeholders (e.g., clients, design companies, and construction companies) in the Chinese construction industry. Descriptive and structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses reveal that contrary to common understanding, clients and geological surveying companies are the major stakeholders responsible for design errors in construction projects. The major factors leading to design errors are design input information error, unreasonable intervention on design, noncompliance with standard requirements, and error in site geological survey document. In contrast, concurrent design and construction requirements and poor working conditions are the least influential factors. Design professionals, regardless of their stakeholder groups, shared similar views on the causes of design errors. This research is among the first to uncover the causes of design errors on construction projects from a multistakeholder perspective. The findings offer valuable insights for stakeholders to improve design quality in the Chinese construction industry and other countries with similar environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jpcfev.cfeng-4862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Causation of Design Error in the Construction Industry: A Multistakeholder Perspective

Jinpeng Wang, Zhenwen Su, Yongjian Ke, Riza Yosia Sunindijo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Construction Project Management and Performance
0.49
article

The Causation of Design Error in the Construction Industry: A Multistakeholder Perspective

Jinpeng Wang, Zhenwen Su, Yongjian Ke, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, Shang Zhang, Xiaoping Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A seemingly minor design error can have significant repercussions in a construction project, leading to serious safety and quality consequences, cost overrun, and delays. This error can have a lasting impact, potentially affecting usability and safety during the operational stage of the completed facility. Despite these consequences, there is limited research on which stakeholders contribute more significantly to design errors. Furthermore, there is a disconnection in understanding among stakeholders about the causes of design errors. To address the knowledge gap, this research aimed to identify the critical causes of design errors from a multistakeholder perspective. Empirical survey data were collected from 243 design professionals (e.g., architects, structural designers, and water supply and drainage designers) across various stakeholders (e.g., clients, design companies, and construction companies) in the Chinese construction industry. Descriptive and structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses reveal that contrary to common understanding, clients and geological surveying companies are the major stakeholders responsible for design errors in construction projects. The major factors leading to design errors are design input information error, unreasonable intervention on design, noncompliance with standard requirements, and error in site geological survey document. In contrast, concurrent design and construction requirements and poor working conditions are the least influential factors. Design professionals, regardless of their stakeholder groups, shared similar views on the causes of design errors. This research is among the first to uncover the causes of design errors on construction projects from a multistakeholder perspective. The findings offer valuable insights for stakeholders to improve design quality in the Chinese construction industry and other countries with similar environments.

Journal of Performance of Constructed FacilitiesVol. 39(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Nantong University (CN), Suzhou University of Science and Technology (CN), UNSW Sydney (AU), Shanghai Xiandai Architectural Design (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Construction Project Management and Performance
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.