Machine Learning Prediction of Foaming in Anaerobic Co-Digestion from Six Key Process Parameters

Foaming in co-digested anaerobic digesters can reduce biogas production, leading to economic loss. However, the underlying causes of foaming are not completely understood. This study investigated a field-scale mesophilic digester system that experienced intermittent foaming, employing experimental and modeling methods over a 16-month period. Samples were collected during both foaming and non-foaming events and were thoroughly characterized for methane (CH4) yields and different physical and chemical concentrations, including volatile solids (VS), metals, total phosphorus (TP), total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD), total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs), and total alkalinity (TALK). Machine learning techniques were applied to predict foaming events with several algorithms tested to optimize prediction accuracy. The results showed that digester liquid and effluent samples collected from foaming events had significantly lower (p < 0.05) average CH4 yields (77 and 45 mL CH4 g VS−1) than during non-foaming events (150 and 83 mL CH4 g VS−1). Recursive feature modeling identified six key parameters (1. Fe(II):S; 2. Fe(II):TP; 3. TCOD; 4. Fe; 5. TVFA:TALK; and 6. Cu) associated with digester foaming. Among the tested machine learning models, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm achieved the highest recognition accuracy of 87%. This study demonstrates that the interactions of multiple chemical and physical process parameters are an important consideration for predicting anaerobic digester foaming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fermentation
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10120639
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Prediction of Foaming in Anaerobic Co-Digestion from Six Key Process Parameters

Ji‐Qin Ni, Sarah E. Daly
3 citations
Fermentation
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
1.08
article

Machine Learning Prediction of Foaming in Anaerobic Co-Digestion from Six Key Process Parameters

Ji‐Qin Ni, Sarah E. Daly
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Foaming in co-digested anaerobic digesters can reduce biogas production, leading to economic loss. However, the underlying causes of foaming are not completely understood. This study investigated a field-scale mesophilic digester system that experienced intermittent foaming, employing experimental and modeling methods over a 16-month period. Samples were collected during both foaming and non-foaming events and were thoroughly characterized for methane (CH4) yields and different physical and chemical concentrations, including volatile solids (VS), metals, total phosphorus (TP), total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD), total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs), and total alkalinity (TALK). Machine learning techniques were applied to predict foaming events with several algorithms tested to optimize prediction accuracy. The results showed that digester liquid and effluent samples collected from foaming events had significantly lower (p < 0.05) average CH4 yields (77 and 45 mL CH4 g VS−1) than during non-foaming events (150 and 83 mL CH4 g VS−1). Recursive feature modeling identified six key parameters (1. Fe(II):S; 2. Fe(II):TP; 3. TCOD; 4. Fe; 5. TVFA:TALK; and 6. Cu) associated with digester foaming. Among the tested machine learning models, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm achieved the highest recognition accuracy of 87%. This study demonstrates that the interactions of multiple chemical and physical process parameters are an important consideration for predicting anaerobic digester foaming.

FermentationVol. 10(12)
Cornell University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.