Evaluating cohesive models in discrete element simulation through drawdown test with new assessment perspectives

This study explores the time-dependent and micro-to-macro behaviours of cohesive wet granules through discrete element simulation of a widely employed calibration procedure, i.e., drawdown test. Two distinct cohesive models, i.e., the Easo Liquid-Bridge (ELB) and simplified JKR (SJKR) are adopted. Their simulation results are not only validated with past experimental observations, but also compared with each other in multiple aspects. The results show substantial difference in time-dependent deformation and mass-volume change correlations characterised by the ELB and SJKR models, though they both show good agreement in bulk parameters with the experiment at final stage of drawdown test. Moreover, this study points out critical deviations in microscale features such as the contact network and porous structure that determines the macroscale responses under different concepts of cohesive contact. The results suggest new assessment parameters for modelling cohesive material and provide a deeper insight into the micro-to-macro understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2024.120542
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating cohesive models in discrete element simulation through drawdown test with new assessment perspectives

Thanh Trung Nguyen, Buddhima Indraratna, Quoc Thien Huynh
7 citations
Powder Technology
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
1.83
article

Evaluating cohesive models in discrete element simulation through drawdown test with new assessment perspectives

Thanh Trung Nguyen, Buddhima Indraratna, Quoc Thien Huynh
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study explores the time-dependent and micro-to-macro behaviours of cohesive wet granules through discrete element simulation of a widely employed calibration procedure, i.e., drawdown test. Two distinct cohesive models, i.e., the Easo Liquid-Bridge (ELB) and simplified JKR (SJKR) are adopted. Their simulation results are not only validated with past experimental observations, but also compared with each other in multiple aspects. The results show substantial difference in time-dependent deformation and mass-volume change correlations characterised by the ELB and SJKR models, though they both show good agreement in bulk parameters with the experiment at final stage of drawdown test. Moreover, this study points out critical deviations in microscale features such as the contact network and porous structure that determines the macroscale responses under different concepts of cohesive contact. The results suggest new assessment parameters for modelling cohesive material and provide a deeper insight into the micro-to-macro understanding.

Powder TechnologyVol. 452
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating cohesive models in discrete element simulation through drawdown test with new assessment perspectives — Thanh Trung Nguyen, Buddhima Indraratna, et al. · Powder Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS