Spoken language identification: An overview of past and present research trends

• Analysis of speech signals for automatic estimation of the language spoken. • Automatic speech recognition, speaker verification, and language identification are compared. • What distinguishes different spoken languages is discussed. • Utility of methods is noted in terms of performance, using accuracy, complexity, and cost as measures. • Approaches include: phonotactics, use of intonation, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, neural networks. • Major components of neural systems (CNN, RNN, Transformer) are discussed. Identification of the language used in spoken utterances is useful for multiple applications, e.g., assist in directing or automating telephone calls, or selecting which language-specific speech recognizer to use. This paper reviews modern methods of automatic language identification. It examines what information in speech helps to distinguish among languages, and extends these ideas to dialect estimation as well. As approaches to recognize languages often share much in common with both automatic speech recognition and speaker verification, these three processes are compared. Many methods are drawn from pattern recognition research in other areas, such as image and text recognition. This paper notes how speech is different from most other signals to recognize, and how language identification differs from other speech applications. While it is mainly addressed to readers who are not experts in speech processing (as detailed algorithms, readily found in the cited literature, are omitted here), the presentation covers a wide discussion useful to experts too.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Speech Communication
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2024.103167
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spoken language identification: An overview of past and present research trends

Douglas O’Shaughnessy
8 citations
Speech Communication
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.78
article

Spoken language identification: An overview of past and present research trends

Douglas O’Shaughnessy
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Analysis of speech signals for automatic estimation of the language spoken. • Automatic speech recognition, speaker verification, and language identification are compared. • What distinguishes different spoken languages is discussed. • Utility of methods is noted in terms of performance, using accuracy, complexity, and cost as measures. • Approaches include: phonotactics, use of intonation, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, neural networks. • Major components of neural systems (CNN, RNN, Transformer) are discussed. Identification of the language used in spoken utterances is useful for multiple applications, e.g., assist in directing or automating telephone calls, or selecting which language-specific speech recognizer to use. This paper reviews modern methods of automatic language identification. It examines what information in speech helps to distinguish among languages, and extends these ideas to dialect estimation as well. As approaches to recognize languages often share much in common with both automatic speech recognition and speaker verification, these three processes are compared. Many methods are drawn from pattern recognition research in other areas, such as image and text recognition. This paper notes how speech is different from most other signals to recognize, and how language identification differs from other speech applications. While it is mainly addressed to readers who are not experts in speech processing (as detailed algorithms, readily found in the cited literature, are omitted here), the presentation covers a wide discussion useful to experts too.

Speech CommunicationVol. 167
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.