Evaluation of engine performance and emissions using blends of gasoline, ethanol, and fusel oil

This study investigates the impact of gasoline, ethanol, and fusel oil blends on engine performance and emissions under varying engine speeds (1000–3000 rpm) and throttle positions (10–40 %). The blends reduced brake power by 3.5–7.1 % and increased Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption by 6.1–16.8 % for ethanol and 4.6–15.9 % for fusel oil. Brake thermal efficiency also declined for both blends. However, emissions improved significantly, with NOx reductions of 17.3 % (ethanol) and 13.8 % (fusel oil), CO reductions of 13.1 % and 9.1 %, and HC reductions of 8.8 % and 6.16 %, respectively. The results highlight trade-offs between performance and emission benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.101065
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of engine performance and emissions using blends of gasoline, ethanol, and fusel oil

S.M. Rosdi, Rizalman Mamat, Mohd Fairusham Ghazali, Erdiwansyah Erdiwansyah
16 citations
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
3.49
article

Evaluation of engine performance and emissions using blends of gasoline, ethanol, and fusel oil

S.M. Rosdi, Rizalman Mamat, Mohd Fairusham Ghazali, Erdiwansyah Erdiwansyah
article en
16 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of gasoline, ethanol, and fusel oil blends on engine performance and emissions under varying engine speeds (1000–3000 rpm) and throttle positions (10–40 %). The blends reduced brake power by 3.5–7.1 % and increased Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption by 6.1–16.8 % for ethanol and 4.6–15.9 % for fusel oil. Brake thermal efficiency also declined for both blends. However, emissions improved significantly, with NOx reductions of 17.3 % (ethanol) and 13.8 % (fusel oil), CO reductions of 13.1 % and 9.1 %, and HC reductions of 8.8 % and 6.16 %, respectively. The results highlight trade-offs between performance and emission benefits.

Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental EngineeringVol. 11
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY), Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Universitas Serambi Mekkah (ID), Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.