Adjusting for medication status in genome-wide association studies

Abstract When conducting genome-wide association studies, addressing medication status that is relevant to the trait of interest can prevent biases that could distort estimates of the true genetic effect. Here, we introduce the genetic empirical medication reduction adjustment (GEMRA) method which uses a heuristic search for an empirical adjustment to be applied to phenotypic values of participants reporting medication use. Through simulations we show that the direct genetic effect estimates in the GEMRA approach exhibited less bias and greater statistical power than common strategies such as including medication as a covariate, restricting the sample to unmedicated users or including all samples without adjustment. We then applied the GEMRA approach to estimate statin medication adjustment for analysis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and antihypertensive medication adjustment for analyses of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure using multi-population data from UK Biobank and the Uganda Genome Resource. We found that a relative rather than an absolute adjustment better modelled the effect of medication on LDL cholesterol, SBP and DBP, with an effect of 40%, 10% and 10% reduction appearing to be consistent across populations, respectively. We also show that spurious differences in medication effects across populations can arise when the effect scale is misspecified. Author Summary When studying how genetics influence health outcomes, it is important to account for medications that can affect the trait being studied. Otherwise, medication use may make genetic effects appear stronger or weaker than they truly are. Here, we developed a method, GEMRA, to account for the effects of medication in genetic studies. Using simulated data, we found that GEMRA was better able to detect true genetic associations than several commonly used approaches. We then used GEMRA to account for the effects of statins on LDL cholesterol and blood pressure medications on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Using data from UK Biobank and the Ugandan Genome Resource, we found that medication effects were better represented as a percentage reduction rather than as the same fixed change for everyone. Our findings also showed that choosing the wrong way to represent medication effects (i.e. as a percentage reduction or fixed value) can create misleading differences between populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Genetics
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012366
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjusting for medication status in genome-wide association studies

Yoonsu Cho, George Davey Smith, Gibran Hemani, Jason Torres et al.
2 citations
PLoS Genetics
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
3.23
article

Adjusting for medication status in genome-wide association studies

Yoonsu Cho, George Davey Smith, Gibran Hemani, Jason Torres, Tom R. Gaunt, Christopher Kintu, Segun Fatumo, Amanda Chong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract When conducting genome-wide association studies, addressing medication status that is relevant to the trait of interest can prevent biases that could distort estimates of the true genetic effect. Here, we introduce the genetic empirical medication reduction adjustment (GEMRA) method which uses a heuristic search for an empirical adjustment to be applied to phenotypic values of participants reporting medication use. Through simulations we show that the direct genetic effect estimates in the GEMRA approach exhibited less bias and greater statistical power than common strategies such as including medication as a covariate, restricting the sample to unmedicated users or including all samples without adjustment. We then applied the GEMRA approach to estimate statin medication adjustment for analysis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and antihypertensive medication adjustment for analyses of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure using multi-population data from UK Biobank and the Uganda Genome Resource. We found that a relative rather than an absolute adjustment better modelled the effect of medication on LDL cholesterol, SBP and DBP, with an effect of 40%, 10% and 10% reduction appearing to be consistent across populations, respectively. We also show that spurious differences in medication effects across populations can arise when the effect scale is misspecified. Author Summary When studying how genetics influence health outcomes, it is important to account for medications that can affect the trait being studied. Otherwise, medication use may make genetic effects appear stronger or weaker than they truly are. Here, we developed a method, GEMRA, to account for the effects of medication in genetic studies. Using simulated data, we found that GEMRA was better able to detect true genetic associations than several commonly used approaches. We then used GEMRA to account for the effects of statins on LDL cholesterol and blood pressure medications on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Using data from UK Biobank and the Ugandan Genome Resource, we found that medication effects were better represented as a percentage reduction rather than as the same fixed change for everyone. Our findings also showed that choosing the wrong way to represent medication effects (i.e. as a percentage reduction or fixed value) can create misleading differences between populations.

PLoS GeneticsVol. 22(11)
University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), MRC Population Health Research Unit (GB), MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (GB), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB), MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit (UG), Uganda Virus Research Institute (UG)
Wellcome Trust, University of Bristol, Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
3.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon