Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection

Forecast reconciliation ensures forecasts of time series in a hierarchy adhere to aggregation constraints, enabling aligned decision making. While forecast reconciliation can enhance overall accuracy in a hierarchical or grouped structure, it can lead to worse forecasts for certain series, with the greatest gains typically seen in series that originally have poorly performing base forecasts. In practical applications, some series in a structure often produce poor base forecasts due to model misspecification or low forecastability. To mitigate their negative impact, we propose two categories of forecast reconciliation methods that incorporate automatic time series selection based on out-of-sample and in-sample information, respectively. These methods keep “poor” base forecasts unused in forming reconciled forecasts, while adjusting the weights assigned to the remaining series accordingly when generating bottom-level reconciled forecasts. Additionally, our methods ameliorate disparities stemming from varied estimators of the base forecast error covariance matrix, alleviating challenges associated with estimator selection. Empirical evaluations through two simulation studies and applications using Australian labour force and domestic tourism data demonstrate the potential of the proposed methods to exclude series with high scaled forecast errors and show promising results. • Presents forecast reconciliation methods with automatic time series selection. • Formulates the problem using either in-sample or out-of-sample information. • Keeps “poor” base forecasts unused in forming reconciled forecasts. • Shows the potential to exclude series with high scaled forecast errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.004
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection

Shanika L. Wickramasuriya, Rob J. Hyndman, Xiaoqian Wang
6 citations
European Journal of Operational Research
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.97
article

Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection

Shanika L. Wickramasuriya, Rob J. Hyndman, Xiaoqian Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Forecast reconciliation ensures forecasts of time series in a hierarchy adhere to aggregation constraints, enabling aligned decision making. While forecast reconciliation can enhance overall accuracy in a hierarchical or grouped structure, it can lead to worse forecasts for certain series, with the greatest gains typically seen in series that originally have poorly performing base forecasts. In practical applications, some series in a structure often produce poor base forecasts due to model misspecification or low forecastability. To mitigate their negative impact, we propose two categories of forecast reconciliation methods that incorporate automatic time series selection based on out-of-sample and in-sample information, respectively. These methods keep “poor” base forecasts unused in forming reconciled forecasts, while adjusting the weights assigned to the remaining series accordingly when generating bottom-level reconciled forecasts. Additionally, our methods ameliorate disparities stemming from varied estimators of the base forecast error covariance matrix, alleviating challenges associated with estimator selection. Empirical evaluations through two simulation studies and applications using Australian labour force and domestic tourism data demonstrate the potential of the proposed methods to exclude series with high scaled forecast errors and show promising results. • Presents forecast reconciliation methods with automatic time series selection. • Formulates the problem using either in-sample or out-of-sample information. • Keeps “poor” base forecasts unused in forming reconciled forecasts. • Shows the potential to exclude series with high scaled forecast errors.

European Journal of Operational ResearchVol. 323(2)
Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection — Shanika L. Wickramasuriya, Rob J. Hyndman, et al. · European Journal of Operational Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS