Preferences of Kazakhstan Students and Faculty for Knowledge Transfer

The focus of this research is to know the preferential displays of students and academic staff concerning Kazakhstan's online and offline knowledge transfer activities. After garnering the pertinent information on knowledge transfer activities, the authors administered two self-administered questionnaires for students and academic staff after checking the reliability and validity of the instrument by using McDonald Omega and Bartlett's tests. They summarized, coded, decoded, and analyzed data collected from 4,765 students and 424 academic staff by using Microsoft Excel, MATLAB, and R Language R Studio. The researchers also analyzed selected hypotheses by using the Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis testing technique. Astonishingly, most students from social sciences prefer the online mode of transformation of knowledge to science students who opt for face-to-face because of the nature of the discipline and the similar opinions expressed by academic staff. During the pandemic, academia depended only on the online mode of knowledge transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.364096
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences of Kazakhstan Students and Faculty for Knowledge Transfer

Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri, Assel Jumasseitova, Nazym Kaidarova
International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

Preferences of Kazakhstan Students and Faculty for Knowledge Transfer

Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri, Assel Jumasseitova, Nazym Kaidarova
article en

Abstract

The focus of this research is to know the preferential displays of students and academic staff concerning Kazakhstan's online and offline knowledge transfer activities. After garnering the pertinent information on knowledge transfer activities, the authors administered two self-administered questionnaires for students and academic staff after checking the reliability and validity of the instrument by using McDonald Omega and Bartlett's tests. They summarized, coded, decoded, and analyzed data collected from 4,765 students and 424 academic staff by using Microsoft Excel, MATLAB, and R Language R Studio. The researchers also analyzed selected hypotheses by using the Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis testing technique. Astonishingly, most students from social sciences prefer the online mode of transformation of knowledge to science students who opt for face-to-face because of the nature of the discipline and the similar opinions expressed by academic staff. During the pandemic, academia depended only on the online mode of knowledge transfer.

International Journal of Asian Business and Information ManagementVol. 15(1)
Kazakh-British Technical University (KZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preferences of Kazakhstan Students and Faculty for Knowledge Transfer — Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri, Assel Jumasseitova, et al. · International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS