Machine Learning-Based Forest Canopy Height Modeling with Multi-Sensor and GEDI Data

In our study, we modelled forest canopy height (FCH) using multi sensor data, including Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI - Relative Height (RH98)) Lidar data. We employed advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically Random Forest (RF) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) for their accuracy, robustness, and effectiveness in handling complex remote sensing data, on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform in the Djelfa “Souariz, Dar Chioukh” Reforestation Region of Algeria by following several phases, beginning with loading the data and proceeding to map the predicted forest canopy height for each model. We have used both statistical metrics, coefficient of determination (R squared), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) to evaluate the accuracy of prediction for each model. The RF model indicates that “Elevation” is the most significant variable, followed by (NIR, Green, and SWIR1) bands,” while the interquartile range (IQR) of the VV polarization “VV_iqr” has the least impact. It achieves high predictive accuracy with an R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.899 in training and 0.831 in validation, with RMSE values of 0.6407 m and 0.8036 m, respectively. In comparison, the CART model also highlights Elevation, (SWIR1 and Green) bands, but with slightly lower performance, showing an R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.865 in training and 0.732 in validation, and RMSE values of 0.7356 m and 1.0442 m, respectively. Therefore, the RF model is preferred here for its superior predictive performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edis63605.2024.10783293
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Forest Canopy Height Modeling with Multi-Sensor and GEDI Data

Ouarzeddine Mounira, Boularbah Souissi, Benhalima Noureddine, Bengusmia Djamal
1 citations
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
article

Machine Learning-Based Forest Canopy Height Modeling with Multi-Sensor and GEDI Data

Ouarzeddine Mounira, Boularbah Souissi, Benhalima Noureddine, Bengusmia Djamal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In our study, we modelled forest canopy height (FCH) using multi sensor data, including Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI - Relative Height (RH98)) Lidar data. We employed advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically Random Forest (RF) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) for their accuracy, robustness, and effectiveness in handling complex remote sensing data, on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform in the Djelfa “Souariz, Dar Chioukh” Reforestation Region of Algeria by following several phases, beginning with loading the data and proceeding to map the predicted forest canopy height for each model. We have used both statistical metrics, coefficient of determination (R squared), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) to evaluate the accuracy of prediction for each model. The RF model indicates that “Elevation” is the most significant variable, followed by (NIR, Green, and SWIR1) bands,” while the interquartile range (IQR) of the VV polarization “VV_iqr” has the least impact. It achieves high predictive accuracy with an R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.899 in training and 0.831 in validation, with RMSE values of 0.6407 m and 0.8036 m, respectively. In comparison, the CART model also highlights Elevation, (SWIR1 and Green) bands, but with slightly lower performance, showing an R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.865 in training and 0.732 in validation, and RMSE values of 0.7356 m and 1.0442 m, respectively. Therefore, the RF model is preferred here for its superior predictive performance.

University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene (DZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.