Numerical Methods to Reduce Measurement Uncertainty and Lower CPM Leak Thresholds

Abstract Within a pipeline system (gas or liquid), the measurement of inbound and outbound flow/energy should balance. In an ideal system, free of measurement or estimation error, a balance showing more product entering the system than exiting the system would indicate loss of product (potential leak or theft). Achieving an exact balance is, in practice, unachievable due to measurement uncertainty and accounting errors. This paper describes novel and technically advanced analytic methods used to identify meter(s) that are the most probable contributors of a discrepancy as well as sub-sections of the system where unmeasured and inaccurately measured quantities are likely to exist. This allows the operator to initiate measures to reduce measurement uncertainty (thereby lowering the threshold of detection for measurement leaks) or identify subsections of the system where physical surveillance should be performed. The methods presented here estimate the relative order of magnitude of measurement error/leak and have been validated on double blind simulated data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133120
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Methods to Reduce Measurement Uncertainty and Lower CPM Leak Thresholds

Gary Choquette, Rick Rans, Warren Petersen
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Numerical Methods to Reduce Measurement Uncertainty and Lower CPM Leak Thresholds

Gary Choquette, Rick Rans, Warren Petersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Within a pipeline system (gas or liquid), the measurement of inbound and outbound flow/energy should balance. In an ideal system, free of measurement or estimation error, a balance showing more product entering the system than exiting the system would indicate loss of product (potential leak or theft). Achieving an exact balance is, in practice, unachievable due to measurement uncertainty and accounting errors. This paper describes novel and technically advanced analytic methods used to identify meter(s) that are the most probable contributors of a discrepancy as well as sub-sections of the system where unmeasured and inaccurately measured quantities are likely to exist. This allows the operator to initiate measures to reduce measurement uncertainty (thereby lowering the threshold of detection for measurement leaks) or identify subsections of the system where physical surveillance should be performed. The methods presented here estimate the relative order of magnitude of measurement error/leak and have been validated on double blind simulated data.

Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Peterson (Norway) (NO), Pipeline Research Council International (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Methods to Reduce Measurement Uncertainty and Lower CPM Leak Thresholds — Gary Choquette, Rick Rans, et al. · Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS