Pipeline Performance Monitoring in a Geohazard Management Program Using Inline Inspection and Strain Gauges

Abstract The focus of a pipeline Geohazard Management Program (GMP) has often been on monitoring ground movement at geohazard locations using technologies such as Borehole Inclinometers (BIs), surface surveys, and ground inspections. Often geotechnical engineers drive the investigation and monitoring of a pipeline intersecting a geohazard; therefore, less emphasis is placed on monitoring the impact on the pipeline and more focus is on monitoring the geohazard directly. Two common methods of monitoring pipeline performance in geohazards are Vibrating Wire Strain Gauges (VWSGs) and In-Line Inspection Inertial Measurement Unit (ILI IMU) surveys. Vibrating Wire (VW) is a mature technology that has been used in a variety of monitoring applications, including monitoring strain in steel members such as pipelines, for nearly a century [1]. ILI IMU data analysis has been successfully used to detect landslide interactions in pipelines for over 25 years [2], with ongoing developments in technologies such as axial strain monitoring tools. This paper highlights two cases studies where the efficacy of these monitoring techniques is examined and compared. This paper includes a discussion of the limitations of both VWSGs and ILI IMU and how these technologies can be complementary in a pipeline GMP, including recommendations on strain gauge implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-134236
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pipeline Performance Monitoring in a Geohazard Management Program Using Inline Inspection and Strain Gauges

Doug Dewar, Coleby Charlesworth, Joel Babcock, Heidi Manicke et al.
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Pipeline Performance Monitoring in a Geohazard Management Program Using Inline Inspection and Strain Gauges

Doug Dewar, Coleby Charlesworth, Joel Babcock, Heidi Manicke, Laura Rubinstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract The focus of a pipeline Geohazard Management Program (GMP) has often been on monitoring ground movement at geohazard locations using technologies such as Borehole Inclinometers (BIs), surface surveys, and ground inspections. Often geotechnical engineers drive the investigation and monitoring of a pipeline intersecting a geohazard; therefore, less emphasis is placed on monitoring the impact on the pipeline and more focus is on monitoring the geohazard directly. Two common methods of monitoring pipeline performance in geohazards are Vibrating Wire Strain Gauges (VWSGs) and In-Line Inspection Inertial Measurement Unit (ILI IMU) surveys. Vibrating Wire (VW) is a mature technology that has been used in a variety of monitoring applications, including monitoring strain in steel members such as pipelines, for nearly a century [1]. ILI IMU data analysis has been successfully used to detect landslide interactions in pipelines for over 25 years [2], with ongoing developments in technologies such as axial strain monitoring tools. This paper highlights two cases studies where the efficacy of these monitoring techniques is examined and compared. This paper includes a discussion of the limitations of both VWSGs and ILI IMU and how these technologies can be complementary in a pipeline GMP, including recommendations on strain gauge implementation.

Line Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.