Comparison of different registration algorithms for infrared polarization image

The interpretation of infrared polarization image is contingent upon the accuracy of image registration. Given the inherent limitations of infrared polarization imaging, include low resolution and blurred texture details, the image registration must be robust and precise. This paper presents the results of feature point extraction and image matching experiments conducted with infrared intensity images acquired by infrared polarization imaging system with three different polarized directions: 0°, 120°, and 240°. The performances of the scale invariant feature transform(SIFT), speedup robust features (SURF) and oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) algorithms are compared with respect to computational speed and accuracy. The results demonstrate that, in the case of large-target infrared polarization scenes, the SIFT algorithm is able to extract the greatest number of feature points and has the highest matching accuracy in comparison with the SURF and ORB algorithm. Furthermore, the ORB algorithm is the fastest in terms of computational speed, with a speed that is more than 1.5 times that of the other two algorithms. In the case of small-target infrared polarization scenes, the registration accuracy and speed of the three algorithms are comparable. The SIFT algorithm is therefore more suitable for rapid registration processing of infrared polarization of small-target scenes. It is necessary to select the most appropriate registration algorithm in accordance with the specific requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045418
Primary Topic
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of different registration algorithms for infrared polarization image

Min Yang, Dongyang Gao, Peng Xiu, Hongxia Mao et al.
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
article

Comparison of different registration algorithms for infrared polarization image

Min Yang, Dongyang Gao, Peng Xiu, Hongxia Mao, Huihua Xu, Jie Yang, Jun Jie Wu
article en

Abstract

The interpretation of infrared polarization image is contingent upon the accuracy of image registration. Given the inherent limitations of infrared polarization imaging, include low resolution and blurred texture details, the image registration must be robust and precise. This paper presents the results of feature point extraction and image matching experiments conducted with infrared intensity images acquired by infrared polarization imaging system with three different polarized directions: 0°, 120°, and 240°. The performances of the scale invariant feature transform(SIFT), speedup robust features (SURF) and oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) algorithms are compared with respect to computational speed and accuracy. The results demonstrate that, in the case of large-target infrared polarization scenes, the SIFT algorithm is able to extract the greatest number of feature points and has the highest matching accuracy in comparison with the SURF and ORB algorithm. Furthermore, the ORB algorithm is the fastest in terms of computational speed, with a speed that is more than 1.5 times that of the other two algorithms. In the case of small-target infrared polarization scenes, the registration accuracy and speed of the three algorithms are comparable. The SIFT algorithm is therefore more suitable for rapid registration processing of infrared polarization of small-target scenes. It is necessary to select the most appropriate registration algorithm in accordance with the specific requirements.

Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of different registration algorithms for infrared polarization image — Min Yang, Dongyang Gao, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS