Dataset coverage evaluation for aircraft detection in SAR images using angle classification method

In computer vision tasks, various types of objects exhibit distinct characteristics in images. By learning and synthesizing the commonalities present in the training set, the neural network effectively performs tasks associated with diverse objects. However, when the training set is incomplete—specifically, when certain classes are missing—it becomes challenging for the network to learn the features of these absent classes during testing. Consequently, the coverage of the training data must be evaluated prior to training the network. This study uses synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aircraft detection as an example to illustrate the importance of evaluating dataset coverage, introduce evaluation methods, and propose solutions for incomplete dataset. Variations in SAR target features occur when the relative observation angle of SAR changes, causing changes in the brightness of the target scattering points. SAR images can exhibit significantly different characteristics even for similar targets. Based on this characteristic, the aircraft in SAR images are classified into eight angle-based classes. If the training set includes fewer than eight angle types for aircraft (at least one), the network will be unable to detect aircraft from all eight angles in the test set. To tackle potential issues arising from incomplete training sets, the following solutions are proposed: Firstly, a clustering algorithm is employed to classify the labeled data more accurately by considering the differences in the heat maps of various feature data. Next, the average heat map is extracted for each data class, overlaid, and compared with the average heat map of the complete test set to identify any missing data types. Finally, the training set is supplemented with the appropriate data based on the identified missing data types. Experimental results using partial data from the SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3048170
Primary Topic
Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dataset coverage evaluation for aircraft detection in SAR images using angle classification method

Yingwei He, Yuanrui Dong, Guojin Feng, Zhe Peng et al.
Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
article

Dataset coverage evaluation for aircraft detection in SAR images using angle classification method

Yingwei He, Yuanrui Dong, Guojin Feng, Zhe Peng, Wende Liu, Weijie Wang, Xiaolu Zhan, Haiyong Gan, Shaozhe Cui
article en

Abstract

In computer vision tasks, various types of objects exhibit distinct characteristics in images. By learning and synthesizing the commonalities present in the training set, the neural network effectively performs tasks associated with diverse objects. However, when the training set is incomplete—specifically, when certain classes are missing—it becomes challenging for the network to learn the features of these absent classes during testing. Consequently, the coverage of the training data must be evaluated prior to training the network. This study uses synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aircraft detection as an example to illustrate the importance of evaluating dataset coverage, introduce evaluation methods, and propose solutions for incomplete dataset. Variations in SAR target features occur when the relative observation angle of SAR changes, causing changes in the brightness of the target scattering points. SAR images can exhibit significantly different characteristics even for similar targets. Based on this characteristic, the aircraft in SAR images are classified into eight angle-based classes. If the training set includes fewer than eight angle types for aircraft (at least one), the network will be unable to detect aircraft from all eight angles in the test set. To tackle potential issues arising from incomplete training sets, the following solutions are proposed: Firstly, a clustering algorithm is employed to classify the labeled data more accurately by considering the differences in the heat maps of various feature data. Next, the average heat map is extracted for each data class, overlaid, and compared with the average heat map of the complete test set to identify any missing data types. Finally, the training set is supplemented with the appropriate data based on the identified missing data types. Experimental results using partial data from the SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Harbin Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.