Oil-Gas Multiphase Flow Surrogate Model Embedded With Mechanism Formulas

Abstract Accurate predictions of pressure and temperature drops in oil-gas multiphase flow pipelines are vital for the design and operational efficiency of oil and gas field pipelines. Mechanistic models, though precise, require lengthy computations, rendering them impractical for the extensive calculations needed during optimization. Moreover, their accuracy is often hampered by limited experimental data ranges. Machine learning surrogate models emerge as a solution, offering swift calculations with high accuracy, yet they typically overlook flow-specific PVT properties and gas velocity. Additionally, the “black box” nature of machine learning is often criticized. Addressing these gaps, our research presents a deep neural network surrogate model that offers faster computation speeds while maintaining nearly the same level of accuracy as mechanistic models. This model synergizes with mechanism formulas, including momentum conservation, and encompassing flow condition PVT properties. It adeptly predicts pressure and temperature changes in pipelines of any orientation, with input parameters including liquid flow rate, gas-oil ratio, inlet pressure/temperature, pipe length, diameter, inclination, and gas-liquid densities (at standard conditions). The outputs are outlet pressure/temperature, gas phase density (at a specific temperature and pressure), gas phase superficial velocity, liquid holdup, and two-phase friction factor. Training with the PIPESIM simulator data, it demonstrates a remarkable prediction accuracy of over 98%, significantly surpassing traditional machine learning and neural network approaches. Additionally, it boasts a computational speed three orders of magnitude faster than conventional mechanistic models, proving its efficacy for extensive, rapid calculations necessary for large-scale pipeline optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133744
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oil-Gas Multiphase Flow Surrogate Model Embedded With Mechanism Formulas

Ning Xu, Shiyuan Pan, Zhuochao Li, Yi Guo et al.
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Oil-Gas Multiphase Flow Surrogate Model Embedded With Mechanism Formulas

Ning Xu, Shiyuan Pan, Zhuochao Li, Yi Guo, Yongtu Liang, Pengtao Niu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate predictions of pressure and temperature drops in oil-gas multiphase flow pipelines are vital for the design and operational efficiency of oil and gas field pipelines. Mechanistic models, though precise, require lengthy computations, rendering them impractical for the extensive calculations needed during optimization. Moreover, their accuracy is often hampered by limited experimental data ranges. Machine learning surrogate models emerge as a solution, offering swift calculations with high accuracy, yet they typically overlook flow-specific PVT properties and gas velocity. Additionally, the “black box” nature of machine learning is often criticized. Addressing these gaps, our research presents a deep neural network surrogate model that offers faster computation speeds while maintaining nearly the same level of accuracy as mechanistic models. This model synergizes with mechanism formulas, including momentum conservation, and encompassing flow condition PVT properties. It adeptly predicts pressure and temperature changes in pipelines of any orientation, with input parameters including liquid flow rate, gas-oil ratio, inlet pressure/temperature, pipe length, diameter, inclination, and gas-liquid densities (at standard conditions). The outputs are outlet pressure/temperature, gas phase density (at a specific temperature and pressure), gas phase superficial velocity, liquid holdup, and two-phase friction factor. Training with the PIPESIM simulator data, it demonstrates a remarkable prediction accuracy of over 98%, significantly surpassing traditional machine learning and neural network approaches. Additionally, it boasts a computational speed three orders of magnitude faster than conventional mechanistic models, proving its efficacy for extensive, rapid calculations necessary for large-scale pipeline optimization.

Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.