Usage of Isotropic Hardening Model Enhanced by Power Law in Simulation of Pipe Material

Abstract Analysis of in-service pressure vessels, pressurized components, and buried pipelines made from carbon steels with high tensile properties and a narrow range between their ultimate stress and yield stress are subject to crack-like flaws. Analysis of these structures requires consideration of various mechanical loads and environmental factors such as temperature, internal pressure, soil pressure, and ground movement. These structures often are subject to design features that can generate or enlarge stress concentrations or deformation over time, potentially resulting in failure. Current standards and assessment procedures offer methodologies for evaluating structural integrity and addressing flaws. The finite element method (FEM) is a powerful tool used for analyzing these structures, but its capability to predict fracture onset, especially in ductile and brittle materials, remains limited. To overcome these limitations, the extended finite element method (XFEM) has been developed, allowing for more accurate modelling of crack propagation and interaction with the surrounding material. However, widespread adoption is hindered by challenges in obtaining experimentally verified material properties tailored for XFEM analysis. This study aims to enhance traditional plasticity models and employ XFEM coupled with the cohesive zone model (CZM) to accurately simulate fracture criteria, providing a promising approach for evaluating flaw behaviour in pipeline steel specimens with different geometric configurations. Force-displacement data were obtained from previous experimental and numerical investigations of pipeline materials using X65 material with round and flat specimens. We integrated various specimen geometries into the Abaqus program with dimensions identical to the published data. Symmetry was utilized whenever appropriate to reduce computational time. Our results indicate that the isotropic hardening model can replicate the force-displacement behaviour of a variety of specimens with various groove radii, up to a particular strain limit, which is dependent on the specimen geometry and stress state. Beyond this limit, the simulations deviate from experimental observations. However, by enhancing the material data through the power law, a higher limit can be obtained. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through the established plasticity platform and by using XFEM-CZM, the necking section can be modelled correctly without the need for damage mechanics models, providing a verification base for the XFEM-CZM methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-130689
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usage of Isotropic Hardening Model Enhanced by Power Law in Simulation of Pipe Material

Sylvester Agbo, Khosrow Behseta, Samer Adeeb
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Usage of Isotropic Hardening Model Enhanced by Power Law in Simulation of Pipe Material

Sylvester Agbo, Khosrow Behseta, Samer Adeeb
article en

Abstract

Abstract Analysis of in-service pressure vessels, pressurized components, and buried pipelines made from carbon steels with high tensile properties and a narrow range between their ultimate stress and yield stress are subject to crack-like flaws. Analysis of these structures requires consideration of various mechanical loads and environmental factors such as temperature, internal pressure, soil pressure, and ground movement. These structures often are subject to design features that can generate or enlarge stress concentrations or deformation over time, potentially resulting in failure. Current standards and assessment procedures offer methodologies for evaluating structural integrity and addressing flaws. The finite element method (FEM) is a powerful tool used for analyzing these structures, but its capability to predict fracture onset, especially in ductile and brittle materials, remains limited. To overcome these limitations, the extended finite element method (XFEM) has been developed, allowing for more accurate modelling of crack propagation and interaction with the surrounding material. However, widespread adoption is hindered by challenges in obtaining experimentally verified material properties tailored for XFEM analysis. This study aims to enhance traditional plasticity models and employ XFEM coupled with the cohesive zone model (CZM) to accurately simulate fracture criteria, providing a promising approach for evaluating flaw behaviour in pipeline steel specimens with different geometric configurations. Force-displacement data were obtained from previous experimental and numerical investigations of pipeline materials using X65 material with round and flat specimens. We integrated various specimen geometries into the Abaqus program with dimensions identical to the published data. Symmetry was utilized whenever appropriate to reduce computational time. Our results indicate that the isotropic hardening model can replicate the force-displacement behaviour of a variety of specimens with various groove radii, up to a particular strain limit, which is dependent on the specimen geometry and stress state. Beyond this limit, the simulations deviate from experimental observations. However, by enhancing the material data through the power law, a higher limit can be obtained. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through the established plasticity platform and by using XFEM-CZM, the necking section can be modelled correctly without the need for damage mechanics models, providing a verification base for the XFEM-CZM methodology.

Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.