Exploring the Role of Residual Stress in Correlating Yield Strength From Indentation-Based Nondestructive Measurements and Destructive Tensile Testing

Abstract Nondestructive determination of the yield strength (YS) for in-ditch materials verification of line pipe is routinely accomplished using indentation methods such as the instrumented indentation test (IIT). While the IIT-predicted YS (YS(IIT)) is generally within ±10 % of the tensile test value (YS(TT)), it occasionally differs by as much as 25 %. This work explores the possible contribution of residual hoop stresses introduced during forming to this aspect of the IIT performance. While in-ditch inspections are rarely informed by prior knowledge of residual stress levels, a better understanding of the potential contribution from manufacturing-induced residual stresses may improve the ability to forecast when measured YS(IIT) values are most likely to accurately reflect benchmark YS(TT) values. The current work compares results of IIT performed on 20 line pipes and on smaller coupons extracted from those same pipes. The results are interpreted based on the assumption that residual hoop stresses introduced during pipe forming are relieved in the coupons when they are extracted from the larger pipe sections. FEA simulations were performed for two of the pipes to explore the potential effect of residual stress and to guide analysis of the experimental data. The analysis revealed probable contributions from residual tensile hoop stresses in half of the pipes. Additional analyses identified limitations in using the Hollomon power law to model the plastic deformation and predict the yield strength from the indentation process. The results indicate that the Hollomon power law tends to underpredict yield strength in materials where the strain hardening exponent is below approximately 0.130 and overpredict it when it is above approximately 0.180.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133508
Primary Topic
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Role of Residual Stress in Correlating Yield Strength From Indentation-Based Nondestructive Measurements and Destructive Tensile Testing

Peter Veloo, Jonathan Gibbs, Solver I. Thorsson, Reza Nasouri et al.
Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
article

Exploring the Role of Residual Stress in Correlating Yield Strength From Indentation-Based Nondestructive Measurements and Destructive Tensile Testing

Peter Veloo, Jonathan Gibbs, Solver I. Thorsson, Reza Nasouri, Emily Brady, P. G. Martin, Jeffrey Kornuta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nondestructive determination of the yield strength (YS) for in-ditch materials verification of line pipe is routinely accomplished using indentation methods such as the instrumented indentation test (IIT). While the IIT-predicted YS (YS(IIT)) is generally within ±10 % of the tensile test value (YS(TT)), it occasionally differs by as much as 25 %. This work explores the possible contribution of residual hoop stresses introduced during forming to this aspect of the IIT performance. While in-ditch inspections are rarely informed by prior knowledge of residual stress levels, a better understanding of the potential contribution from manufacturing-induced residual stresses may improve the ability to forecast when measured YS(IIT) values are most likely to accurately reflect benchmark YS(TT) values. The current work compares results of IIT performed on 20 line pipes and on smaller coupons extracted from those same pipes. The results are interpreted based on the assumption that residual hoop stresses introduced during pipe forming are relieved in the coupons when they are extracted from the larger pipe sections. FEA simulations were performed for two of the pipes to explore the potential effect of residual stress and to guide analysis of the experimental data. The analysis revealed probable contributions from residual tensile hoop stresses in half of the pipes. Additional analyses identified limitations in using the Hollomon power law to model the plastic deformation and predict the yield strength from the indentation process. The results indicate that the Hollomon power law tends to underpredict yield strength in materials where the strain hardening exponent is below approximately 0.130 and overpredict it when it is above approximately 0.180.

Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
Exponent (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.