Hydrogen Pressure Cycling of Subscale Pipes to Simulate Full-Scale Testing of Transmission Pipelines

Abstract Full-scale testing of pipes is costly and requires significant infrastructure investments. Subscale testing offers the potential to substantially reduce experimental costs and provides testing flexibility when transferrable test conditions and specimens can be established. To this end, a subscale pipe testing platform was developed to pressure cycle 60 mm diameter pipes (Nominal Pipe Size 2) to failure with gaseous hydrogen. Engineered defects were machined into the inner surface or outer surface to represent pre-existing flaws. The pipes were pressure cycled to failure with gaseous hydrogen at pressures to match operating stresses in large diameter pipes (e.g., stresses comparable to similar fractions of the specified minimum yield stress in transmission pipelines). Additionally, the pipe specimens were instrumented to identify crack initiation, such that crack growth could be compared to fracture mechanics predictions. Predictions leverage an extensive body of materials testing in gaseous hydrogen (e.g., ASME B31.12 Code Case 220) and the recently developed probabilistic fracture mechanics framework for hydrogen (Hydrogen Extremely Low Probability of Rupture, HELPR). In this work, we evaluate the failure response of these subscale pipe specimens and assess the conservatism of fracture mechanics-based design strategies (e.g., API 579/ASME FFS). This paper describes the subscale hydrogen testing capability, compares experimental outcomes to predictions from the probabilistic hydrogen fracture framework (HELPR), and discusses the complement to full-scale testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-134173
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen Pressure Cycling of Subscale Pipes to Simulate Full-Scale Testing of Transmission Pipelines

Joseph Ronevich, Christopher W. San Marchi, Benjamin Schroeder, Bradley Moore Davis
2 citations
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
0.67
article

Hydrogen Pressure Cycling of Subscale Pipes to Simulate Full-Scale Testing of Transmission Pipelines

Joseph Ronevich, Christopher W. San Marchi, Benjamin Schroeder, Bradley Moore Davis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Full-scale testing of pipes is costly and requires significant infrastructure investments. Subscale testing offers the potential to substantially reduce experimental costs and provides testing flexibility when transferrable test conditions and specimens can be established. To this end, a subscale pipe testing platform was developed to pressure cycle 60 mm diameter pipes (Nominal Pipe Size 2) to failure with gaseous hydrogen. Engineered defects were machined into the inner surface or outer surface to represent pre-existing flaws. The pipes were pressure cycled to failure with gaseous hydrogen at pressures to match operating stresses in large diameter pipes (e.g., stresses comparable to similar fractions of the specified minimum yield stress in transmission pipelines). Additionally, the pipe specimens were instrumented to identify crack initiation, such that crack growth could be compared to fracture mechanics predictions. Predictions leverage an extensive body of materials testing in gaseous hydrogen (e.g., ASME B31.12 Code Case 220) and the recently developed probabilistic fracture mechanics framework for hydrogen (Hydrogen Extremely Low Probability of Rupture, HELPR). In this work, we evaluate the failure response of these subscale pipe specimens and assess the conservatism of fracture mechanics-based design strategies (e.g., API 579/ASME FFS). This paper describes the subscale hydrogen testing capability, compares experimental outcomes to predictions from the probabilistic hydrogen fracture framework (HELPR), and discusses the complement to full-scale testing.

Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.