Application of a Newly Standardized Risk-Based Pressure Design Approach – Implications From Pilot Studies

Abstract A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed as an alternative to the class location approach currently used in the Canadian Standards Association’s (CSA’s) Standard Z662. This new approach was adopted in the non-mandatory Annex C of the 2023 edition of CSA Z662. The risk-based design approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pipe’s pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors are calibrated to meet reliability targets based on undamaged pipe burst and third-party mechanical damage failure limit states. These reliability targets are defined for a set of consequence-based safety classes to achieve a consistent, broadly acceptable, level of risk for all pipelines. Since the approach was adopted in CSA Z662 in 2023, several pilot studies, as described in this paper, have applied it to segments of high-pressure transmission pipelines in Canada. While this approach can also apply to new designs, the pilot studies described in this paper consider scenarios in which existing designs must be re-evaluated, including for class location changes due to population encroachment and the construction of road crossings. This paper describes the results of these pilot studies and demonstrates the safety and financial implications of adopting the new risk-based pressure design approach at such sites that need re-evaluating. This is done by comparing the design requirements under the new risk-based approach, such as pressure and wall thickness, with the requirements of the existing class location approach. In some cases, the pilot studies demonstrate that the new risk-based approach can reduce over-conservatism with less-restrictive design requirements, resulting in a positive financial benefit while maintaining broadly acceptable levels of safety. The benefit of using alternative mitigation options, such as mechanical damage prevention measures, is also explored in some of the pilot studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133083
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a Newly Standardized Risk-Based Pressure Design Approach – Implications From Pilot Studies

Dongliang Lu, Riski Adianto, Lowell McAllister, Aiden Svitich et al.
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Application of a Newly Standardized Risk-Based Pressure Design Approach – Implications From Pilot Studies

Dongliang Lu, Riski Adianto, Lowell McAllister, Aiden Svitich, Cory Wiechnik, Emeka Ezeiruaku
article en

Abstract

Abstract A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed as an alternative to the class location approach currently used in the Canadian Standards Association’s (CSA’s) Standard Z662. This new approach was adopted in the non-mandatory Annex C of the 2023 edition of CSA Z662. The risk-based design approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pipe’s pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors are calibrated to meet reliability targets based on undamaged pipe burst and third-party mechanical damage failure limit states. These reliability targets are defined for a set of consequence-based safety classes to achieve a consistent, broadly acceptable, level of risk for all pipelines. Since the approach was adopted in CSA Z662 in 2023, several pilot studies, as described in this paper, have applied it to segments of high-pressure transmission pipelines in Canada. While this approach can also apply to new designs, the pilot studies described in this paper consider scenarios in which existing designs must be re-evaluated, including for class location changes due to population encroachment and the construction of road crossings. This paper describes the results of these pilot studies and demonstrates the safety and financial implications of adopting the new risk-based pressure design approach at such sites that need re-evaluating. This is done by comparing the design requirements under the new risk-based approach, such as pressure and wall thickness, with the requirements of the existing class location approach. In some cases, the pilot studies demonstrate that the new risk-based approach can reduce over-conservatism with less-restrictive design requirements, resulting in a positive financial benefit while maintaining broadly acceptable levels of safety. The benefit of using alternative mitigation options, such as mechanical damage prevention measures, is also explored in some of the pilot studies.

Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada (CA), C&R Technologies (United States) (US), Digital Research Alliance of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.