Dent-Weld Interaction for Strain Assessment

Abstract Dents are an integrity threat to oil and gas pipelines. Due to the higher perceived risk of cracking associated with dents on welds, the acceptability thresholds for dents interacting with welds are more stringent than that for plain dents in the pipe body. Similar to the depth based criteria, when curvature strain assessment is utilized to determine dent acceptability, the acceptability threshold for a plain dent on the pipe body and a dent interacting with a weld is 6% (material specific limits are also available) and 4%, respectively. When applying these screening criteria based on in-line inspection data, one practical challenge is to determine whether a dent is interacting with weld or not. Since weld interaction directly dictates the dent acceptability threshold, it affects repair decisions and hence may have a large impact on a pipeline operators’ budget and potentially pipeline safety. Overly conservative dent-weld interaction rules can cause unnecessary repair or investigation; whereas non-conservative dent-weld interaction rules may lead to injurious and non-compliant dents left in place unrepaired. This paper presents a study of the dent-weld interaction rules from strain assessment perspective. A strain assessment database with greater than 9,000 dents, detected and measured by ILI, was utilized in this study to investigate the potential of applying existing dent-weld interaction criteria for strain assessment purposes. Recommendations are made with respect to applying such criteria for dent screening based on ILI data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-120843
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dent-Weld Interaction for Strain Assessment

Taojun Liu, Chris Holliday
2 links
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
article

Dent-Weld Interaction for Strain Assessment

Taojun Liu, Chris Holliday
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dents are an integrity threat to oil and gas pipelines. Due to the higher perceived risk of cracking associated with dents on welds, the acceptability thresholds for dents interacting with welds are more stringent than that for plain dents in the pipe body. Similar to the depth based criteria, when curvature strain assessment is utilized to determine dent acceptability, the acceptability threshold for a plain dent on the pipe body and a dent interacting with a weld is 6% (material specific limits are also available) and 4%, respectively. When applying these screening criteria based on in-line inspection data, one practical challenge is to determine whether a dent is interacting with weld or not. Since weld interaction directly dictates the dent acceptability threshold, it affects repair decisions and hence may have a large impact on a pipeline operators’ budget and potentially pipeline safety. Overly conservative dent-weld interaction rules can cause unnecessary repair or investigation; whereas non-conservative dent-weld interaction rules may lead to injurious and non-compliant dents left in place unrepaired. This paper presents a study of the dent-weld interaction rules from strain assessment perspective. A strain assessment database with greater than 9,000 dents, detected and measured by ILI, was utilized in this study to investigate the potential of applying existing dent-weld interaction criteria for strain assessment purposes. Recommendations are made with respect to applying such criteria for dent screening based on ILI data.

Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.