Optimizing Risk Reduction: a Data-Driven Approach for Strategic Preventive and Mitigative Action Planning
Abstract This paper presents an approach to empower risk management practitioners in navigating challenges posed by regulatory frameworks, aging infrastructure, and sustainability imperatives. The focus is on using quantitative risk assessment tools to identify, prioritize, and implement preventive and mitigative measures. The paper discusses tools, methods, and considerations that enable operators to synthesize risk assessment outputs, offering insights into feasible projects and evaluating their benefits in relation to costs. Real-world applications across various energy sector operators emphasize the significance of quantitative risk modeling algorithms. The paper advocates for a data-driven decision-making framework, supporting the development of robust corporate risk management strategies. Example use cases highlight the integration of cost-benefit analyses and the application of the “As Low As Reasonably Practicable” (ALARP) criteria. Key insights include principles for aggregating risk assessment results, process considerations for identifying candidate measures, and a methodology for consistent, actionable conversations about risk thresholds. The paper underscores the economic and operational advantages derived from specific risk mitigation measures, validating the ALARP principle’s efficacy in guiding investment decisions. Conclusions offer strides in fortifying operational resilience and sustainability while keeping safety in the forefront. By leveraging quantitative risk modeling, data aggregation, and a consistent strategy for decision-making, the paper provides a practical approach for industry professionals to proactively address challenges and foster a culture of enhanced risk management.
Authors
- Jake Murray
Institutions
- DNV (Norway) (NO)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-09-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-132099
- Primary Topic
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00