Is Pipeline Safety Improving?

Abstract The analysis of historical gas transmission pipeline failure trends in North America shows an improvement over the last twenty years. Many factors are driving the improvement in pipeline safety performance; the introduction of Integrity Management in pipeline regulations, such as the US Code of Federal Regulations, has set forward minimum requirements and brought consistency across pipeline operators for the minimum level of care. This paper addresses the question, is integrity management having an impact on safety performance? Many pipeline operators have extended the application of minimum requirements beyond high consequence areas. Operators have applied and developed advanced internal inspection technologies, threat analytics and integrity planning strategies. In addition, Operators are adopting reliability and risk management frameworks, not only to prioritized assessments in a baseline program, but to perform risk-informed integrity decision-making on an ongoing basis throughout the asset life-cycle. This paper uses publicly available pipeline incident data sets to trend failures and incidents using technically-sound analysis techniques routinely used in high reliability industries to show evidence that pipeline safety continues to improve and that the current levels of safety and reliability are aligned with the expectations of the industry, the regulations, and the public. The paper focuses on pipelines rupture incidents classified by root cause threats, location classes, and health, safety and environmental consequences. A societal risk assessment is used to estimate pipeline residual risks and provide recommendations for integrity management frameworks to advance the standard of care through continual improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133989
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Pipeline Safety Improving?

Martín Di Blasi, Mark Hereth, Jason Skow
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Is Pipeline Safety Improving?

Martín Di Blasi, Mark Hereth, Jason Skow
article en

Abstract

Abstract The analysis of historical gas transmission pipeline failure trends in North America shows an improvement over the last twenty years. Many factors are driving the improvement in pipeline safety performance; the introduction of Integrity Management in pipeline regulations, such as the US Code of Federal Regulations, has set forward minimum requirements and brought consistency across pipeline operators for the minimum level of care. This paper addresses the question, is integrity management having an impact on safety performance? Many pipeline operators have extended the application of minimum requirements beyond high consequence areas. Operators have applied and developed advanced internal inspection technologies, threat analytics and integrity planning strategies. In addition, Operators are adopting reliability and risk management frameworks, not only to prioritized assessments in a baseline program, but to perform risk-informed integrity decision-making on an ongoing basis throughout the asset life-cycle. This paper uses publicly available pipeline incident data sets to trend failures and incidents using technically-sound analysis techniques routinely used in high reliability industries to show evidence that pipeline safety continues to improve and that the current levels of safety and reliability are aligned with the expectations of the industry, the regulations, and the public. The paper focuses on pipelines rupture incidents classified by root cause threats, location classes, and health, safety and environmental consequences. A societal risk assessment is used to estimate pipeline residual risks and provide recommendations for integrity management frameworks to advance the standard of care through continual improvement.

Pure Earth (US), Integral Consulting (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.