Convert or Not to Convert? Practical Scoping Considerations for Converting Pipelines to Carbon Dioxide Service

Abstract With the move to Net Zero there has been increased demand to utilize pipelines to transport carbon dioxide. As part of these efforts, repurposing hydrocarbon pipelines is an attractive option. The advantages of repurposing existing pipelines rather than building new ones include minimum disturbance to people and the environment, and reduced capital expenditure. While existing documents provide guidance of an overall process to convert, they do not delve into granularity surrounding scoping metrics to screen potential opportunities from impractical applications. Interdependencies of key considerations such as capacity, operating pressure, fluid composition and phase composition will be described with a sequential decision-based methodology proposed. The purposed methodology is a front-end project screening tool recommended to be used in collaboration with business development prior to investing in detailed engineering evaluations of selected candidate pipelines. This further evaluation is required after screening to evaluate the current state of the asset, define specific flow capacities under both summer and winter conditions, class location assessment, detailed consequence modelling and project risk registry to capture all risks. Cost considerations applicable to the detailed assessment will be discussed to support high level assessment of project viability. Examples of typical hydrocarbon pipelines in Alberta are provided to demonstrate the application of the methodology in scoping potential conversion projects. From these examples, it is evident that conversion to gas phase service is typically feasible whereas there are fewer pipelines capable of conversion to dense phase service. Even with conversion being technical feasible, the project must be commercially viable. Gas phase conversion candidates may struggle to meet capacity demands. Whereas, dense phase conversion candidates may be hindered by additional costs associated with modifications identified in detailed engineering. The final decision on whether to convert or not to convert depends on accurate detailed assessments of all the details including the cost of the assessment itself. This paper provides an approach to screen projects for viability before undertaking detailed engineering assessments to provide a more tactical approach to building out carbon dioxide pipeline networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2024-133620
Primary Topic
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Convert or Not to Convert? Practical Scoping Considerations for Converting Pipelines to Carbon Dioxide Service

Mark Brimacombe, Nicki Robertson, Graeme King
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
article

Convert or Not to Convert? Practical Scoping Considerations for Converting Pipelines to Carbon Dioxide Service

Mark Brimacombe, Nicki Robertson, Graeme King
article en

Abstract

Abstract With the move to Net Zero there has been increased demand to utilize pipelines to transport carbon dioxide. As part of these efforts, repurposing hydrocarbon pipelines is an attractive option. The advantages of repurposing existing pipelines rather than building new ones include minimum disturbance to people and the environment, and reduced capital expenditure. While existing documents provide guidance of an overall process to convert, they do not delve into granularity surrounding scoping metrics to screen potential opportunities from impractical applications. Interdependencies of key considerations such as capacity, operating pressure, fluid composition and phase composition will be described with a sequential decision-based methodology proposed. The purposed methodology is a front-end project screening tool recommended to be used in collaboration with business development prior to investing in detailed engineering evaluations of selected candidate pipelines. This further evaluation is required after screening to evaluate the current state of the asset, define specific flow capacities under both summer and winter conditions, class location assessment, detailed consequence modelling and project risk registry to capture all risks. Cost considerations applicable to the detailed assessment will be discussed to support high level assessment of project viability. Examples of typical hydrocarbon pipelines in Alberta are provided to demonstrate the application of the methodology in scoping potential conversion projects. From these examples, it is evident that conversion to gas phase service is typically feasible whereas there are fewer pipelines capable of conversion to dense phase service. Even with conversion being technical feasible, the project must be commercially viable. Gas phase conversion candidates may struggle to meet capacity demands. Whereas, dense phase conversion candidates may be hindered by additional costs associated with modifications identified in detailed engineering. The final decision on whether to convert or not to convert depends on accurate detailed assessments of all the details including the cost of the assessment itself. This paper provides an approach to screen projects for viability before undertaking detailed engineering assessments to provide a more tactical approach to building out carbon dioxide pipeline networks.

Line Corporation (Japan) (JP), Engineering (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.