Centering Relevance in Information Literacy Teaching and Learning

The process of determining whether a source of information is relevant is multidimensional, dynamic, and subjective. This essay puts information science scholarship on relevance, including the process and nature of making relevance judgments, in conversation with models of teaching and learning information literacy. Teaching librarians are encouraged to recognize students’ relevance judgments as sites of reflection and instruction. This essay suggests a variety of ways librarians might do this, from re-thinking source evaluation methods to emphasizing the opportunities available at the source selection stage. The process of determining relevance is a practical site of reflective possibility and deserves greater attention in information literacy teaching and learning. Discussing relevance judgments can help students better understand and evaluate sources, reflect on their own and others’ perspectives and motivations, and create opportunities to discuss the impact of information systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Information Literacy
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2024.18.2.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centering Relevance in Information Literacy Teaching and Learning

Alexander Graf
1 citations
Communications in Information Literacy
Library Science and Information Literacy
2.54
article

Centering Relevance in Information Literacy Teaching and Learning

Alexander Graf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The process of determining whether a source of information is relevant is multidimensional, dynamic, and subjective. This essay puts information science scholarship on relevance, including the process and nature of making relevance judgments, in conversation with models of teaching and learning information literacy. Teaching librarians are encouraged to recognize students’ relevance judgments as sites of reflection and instruction. This essay suggests a variety of ways librarians might do this, from re-thinking source evaluation methods to emphasizing the opportunities available at the source selection stage. The process of determining relevance is a practical site of reflective possibility and deserves greater attention in information literacy teaching and learning. Discussing relevance judgments can help students better understand and evaluate sources, reflect on their own and others’ perspectives and motivations, and create opportunities to discuss the impact of information systems.

Communications in Information LiteracyVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Library Science and Information Literacy
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Centering Relevance in Information Literacy Teaching and Learning — Alexander Graf · Communications in Information Literacy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS