Kienbock's Disease and the Risk Factors Associated with Reoperation: A SPARCS Database Review over 10 Years

<b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this study was to utilize a large multi-institutional database to identify risk factors associated with the need for revision surgery and to determine revision rate in patients who underwent operative treatment of Kienbock's disease (KD). <b>Materials and Methods</b> The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent any surgical procedure with a diagnosis of KD from 2011 to 2021. The control cohort diagnoses included primary osteoarthritis of the carpus or wrist. All statistical calculations were performed using R version 4.2.2 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). <b>Results</b> There were a total of 499 patients in the KD cohort and 6,823 patient controls. The KD cohort was significantly younger, had a greater proportion of females, and higher rates of obesity. The control cohort, on average, had more comorbidities as evidenced by the higher Elixhauser Index compared with the KD cohort. Overall revision rate for KD patients was 12% ( <i>n</i> = 59). None of the index procedures were more likely to be revised compared with wrist arthrodesis. Compared with the control cohort, patients with KD were less likely to undergo revision surgery. At 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year intervals, KD patients maintained a lower revision rate compared with controls. Risk factor for eventual revision included worker's compensation status and protective factors included older age, a diagnosis of Kienbock's, male sex, obesity, and higher Elixhauser Index. <b>Conclusion</b> In a large multi-institutional analysis, patients who underwent surgical treatment of KD experienced a lower revision rate over a 10-year period compared with arthritic controls. Compared with the single-institution cohorts published, the overall KD revision rate was higher (12%) but similar to the published literature, the KD revision rate is lower than the same procedures for non-KD controls. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Therapeutic, IV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kienbock's Disease and the Risk Factors Associated with Reoperation: A SPARCS Database Review over 10 Years

Matthew V. Abola, Lauren Smith, S. Steven Yang, Utkarsh Anil et al.
1 citations
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
0.57
article

Kienbock's Disease and the Risk Factors Associated with Reoperation: A SPARCS Database Review over 10 Years

Matthew V. Abola, Lauren Smith, S. Steven Yang, Utkarsh Anil, Matthew Gonzalez, Michelle M. Richardson, Charles C. Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this study was to utilize a large multi-institutional database to identify risk factors associated with the need for revision surgery and to determine revision rate in patients who underwent operative treatment of Kienbock's disease (KD). <b>Materials and Methods</b> The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent any surgical procedure with a diagnosis of KD from 2011 to 2021. The control cohort diagnoses included primary osteoarthritis of the carpus or wrist. All statistical calculations were performed using R version 4.2.2 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). <b>Results</b> There were a total of 499 patients in the KD cohort and 6,823 patient controls. The KD cohort was significantly younger, had a greater proportion of females, and higher rates of obesity. The control cohort, on average, had more comorbidities as evidenced by the higher Elixhauser Index compared with the KD cohort. Overall revision rate for KD patients was 12% ( <i>n</i> = 59). None of the index procedures were more likely to be revised compared with wrist arthrodesis. Compared with the control cohort, patients with KD were less likely to undergo revision surgery. At 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year intervals, KD patients maintained a lower revision rate compared with controls. Risk factor for eventual revision included worker's compensation status and protective factors included older age, a diagnosis of Kienbock's, male sex, obesity, and higher Elixhauser Index. <b>Conclusion</b> In a large multi-institutional analysis, patients who underwent surgical treatment of KD experienced a lower revision rate over a 10-year period compared with arthritic controls. Compared with the single-institution cohorts published, the overall KD revision rate was higher (12%) but similar to the published literature, the KD revision rate is lower than the same procedures for non-KD controls. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Therapeutic, IV.

Journal of Wrist SurgeryVol. 14(03)
New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.