Modeling Infectious Disease Spread: Comparison of the Agent-Based-Modeling and Differential-Equation Approaches

In epidemiology, the SIR model is commonly used to describe the population dynamics ofinfectious diseases. It divides the population into three categories: Susceptible, Infected, and Recovered. We consider two approaches to describe its population dynamics. In the Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) approach, we solve a set of differential equations that describe the rate of change of the fraction of each category. In the Agent-Based Model (ABM), we keep track of the state of each person and its position in a two-dimensional lattice. The ODE model has two model parameters, the infection strength b and the recovery rate k, whereas the ABM has three model parameters describing the diffusion, infection, and recovery rates. Our research aims to compare the two approaches and to establish a relationship between the ODE and ABM parameters. To find the optimal values of the b and k parameters that give matching results to the ABM simulation results, we employ two methods. In the first method, we determine the optimal b and k values by minimizing the differences between the curves generated by the ODE and ABM approaches. In the second method, we use an established relation between the end-state ratio of uninfected people and the contact number b/k. Our results show that these two estimation methods give consistent results and explain the fast-diffusion limit situation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/m417164598
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Infectious Disease Spread: Comparison of the Agent-Based-Modeling and Differential-Equation Approaches

EunSang Park, Changho Kim
UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Modeling Infectious Disease Spread: Comparison of the Agent-Based-Modeling and Differential-Equation Approaches

EunSang Park, Changho Kim
article en

Abstract

In epidemiology, the SIR model is commonly used to describe the population dynamics ofinfectious diseases. It divides the population into three categories: Susceptible, Infected, and Recovered. We consider two approaches to describe its population dynamics. In the Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) approach, we solve a set of differential equations that describe the rate of change of the fraction of each category. In the Agent-Based Model (ABM), we keep track of the state of each person and its position in a two-dimensional lattice. The ODE model has two model parameters, the infection strength b and the recovery rate k, whereas the ABM has three model parameters describing the diffusion, infection, and recovery rates. Our research aims to compare the two approaches and to establish a relationship between the ODE and ABM parameters. To find the optimal values of the b and k parameters that give matching results to the ABM simulation results, we employ two methods. In the first method, we determine the optimal b and k values by minimizing the differences between the curves generated by the ODE and ABM approaches. In the second method, we use an established relation between the end-state ratio of uninfected people and the contact number b/k. Our results show that these two estimation methods give consistent results and explain the fast-diffusion limit situation.

UC Merced Undergraduate Research JournalVol. 17(1)
University of California, Merced (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.