Impact of various flood conditions on the CO2 ecosystem exchange as a component of floodplain grassland restoration

Beyond flood protection to prevent severe damage, the restored floodplain grassland in Austria provides ecosystem services in terms of carbon balance. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary productivity (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (R eco ) were quantified by the eddy covariance (EC) method before, during and after a severe flooding event. Our results show that the carbon balance is heavily influenced by water level in the study site. The diurnal variations influenced by various degree from the flood are analysed, showing the average daily GPP of the floodplain grassland in Marchegg dropping from 1.048 g C m −2 day −1 before the flood, down to 0.470 g C m −2 day −1 during the flood. The study demonstrates that the restored floodplain grassland in Marchegg functions as a robust CO2 sink with a cumulative NEE of 38.8 g carbon per m2 over the three-month study period, despite temporary disruptions caused by flooding events. The findings emphasise the considerable potential of floodplain grassland restoration for carbon storage and climate change mitigation, with the new data from the EC station offering valuable insights for future restoration projects. Finally, this supports the adoption of the new EU Nature Restoration Law and the need for restoring wetlands, floodplains and rivers to secure water availability and biodiversity in these unique ecosystems. NBS and more specifically as Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) are methods with ecological advantages and a huge potential for sustainable recreation of near-natural ecosystems. It is of crucial importance to prove these beneficial effects, and to quantify them transparently in terms of quality assurance and use of resources in a sustainable and eco-friendly way. • Carbon balance is heavily influenced by water level • Flooding results in lowered gross primary productivity • Floodplain grassland restored by soil and water bioengineering mitigates severe flooding

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107489
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of various flood conditions on the CO2 ecosystem exchange as a component of floodplain grassland restoration

Hans Peter Rauch, Magdalena von der Thannen, Kuno Kasak, Anna Lindenberger et al.
4 citations
Ecological Engineering
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.13
article

Impact of various flood conditions on the CO2 ecosystem exchange as a component of floodplain grassland restoration

Hans Peter Rauch, Magdalena von der Thannen, Kuno Kasak, Anna Lindenberger, M. Stelzhammer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Beyond flood protection to prevent severe damage, the restored floodplain grassland in Austria provides ecosystem services in terms of carbon balance. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary productivity (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (R eco ) were quantified by the eddy covariance (EC) method before, during and after a severe flooding event. Our results show that the carbon balance is heavily influenced by water level in the study site. The diurnal variations influenced by various degree from the flood are analysed, showing the average daily GPP of the floodplain grassland in Marchegg dropping from 1.048 g C m −2 day −1 before the flood, down to 0.470 g C m −2 day −1 during the flood. The study demonstrates that the restored floodplain grassland in Marchegg functions as a robust CO2 sink with a cumulative NEE of 38.8 g carbon per m2 over the three-month study period, despite temporary disruptions caused by flooding events. The findings emphasise the considerable potential of floodplain grassland restoration for carbon storage and climate change mitigation, with the new data from the EC station offering valuable insights for future restoration projects. Finally, this supports the adoption of the new EU Nature Restoration Law and the need for restoring wetlands, floodplains and rivers to secure water availability and biodiversity in these unique ecosystems. NBS and more specifically as Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) are methods with ecological advantages and a huge potential for sustainable recreation of near-natural ecosystems. It is of crucial importance to prove these beneficial effects, and to quantify them transparently in terms of quality assurance and use of resources in a sustainable and eco-friendly way. • Carbon balance is heavily influenced by water level • Flooding results in lowered gross primary productivity • Floodplain grassland restored by soil and water bioengineering mitigates severe flooding

Ecological EngineeringVol. 212
FWF Austrian Science Fund (AT), University of Tartu (EE), BOKU University (AT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.