Simulating sagebrush–cheatgrass plant community biomass production in the Great Basin using ALMANAC

Abstract Cheatgrass ( Bromus tectorum ) is a widespread species of concern throughout the western US, as it dominates many low‐elevation rangelands and continues to spread annually. As a winter annual grass, however, cheatgrass can produce high‐quality and cheap protein forage for livestock early in the growing season. Estimating biomass can lead to better management in these western United States and Great Basin plant communities. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of biomass simulations in Great Basin plant communities using the process‐based Agricultural Land Management Alternative with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) model as it simulates biomass production and competing species interactions. For this study, data were used from the Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluation Project to simulate cheatgrass, perennial grass, forb, and sagebrush biomass across three community types: native, invaded, and a co‐dominated community of sagebrush, perennial grasses, cheatgrass, and forbs at six representative Great Basin sites from 2006 to 2018. Our results indicated a strong relationship between simulated and measured biomass of total cheatgrass and perennial grasses across the three plant communities. Sagebrush and forb biomass were poorly simulated across most plant community types. Model accuracy also varied by site, largely depending on elevation. We saw high variability in simulated biomass across years, likely because of the single point‐in‐time measurements at peak biomass and the low biomass values of cheatgrass and forbs. Collectively, ALMANAC shows potential for assessing biomass production and plant interactions but will require more data and model development to fully comprehend its utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Science
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21440
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulating sagebrush–cheatgrass plant community biomass production in the Great Basin using ALMANAC

Kelly Robert Thorp, Roger L. Sheley, Kirk W. Davies, Stuart P. Hardegree et al.
Crop Science
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Simulating sagebrush–cheatgrass plant community biomass production in the Great Basin using ALMANAC

Kelly Robert Thorp, Roger L. Sheley, Kirk W. Davies, Stuart P. Hardegree, James R. Kiniry, Beth A. Newingham, Amber S. Williams, Merilynn C. Schantz, C. Jason Williams
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cheatgrass ( Bromus tectorum ) is a widespread species of concern throughout the western US, as it dominates many low‐elevation rangelands and continues to spread annually. As a winter annual grass, however, cheatgrass can produce high‐quality and cheap protein forage for livestock early in the growing season. Estimating biomass can lead to better management in these western United States and Great Basin plant communities. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of biomass simulations in Great Basin plant communities using the process‐based Agricultural Land Management Alternative with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) model as it simulates biomass production and competing species interactions. For this study, data were used from the Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluation Project to simulate cheatgrass, perennial grass, forb, and sagebrush biomass across three community types: native, invaded, and a co‐dominated community of sagebrush, perennial grasses, cheatgrass, and forbs at six representative Great Basin sites from 2006 to 2018. Our results indicated a strong relationship between simulated and measured biomass of total cheatgrass and perennial grasses across the three plant communities. Sagebrush and forb biomass were poorly simulated across most plant community types. Model accuracy also varied by site, largely depending on elevation. We saw high variability in simulated biomass across years, likely because of the single point‐in‐time measurements at peak biomass and the low biomass values of cheatgrass and forbs. Collectively, ALMANAC shows potential for assessing biomass production and plant interactions but will require more data and model development to fully comprehend its utility.

Crop ScienceVol. 65(1)
Northwest Watershed Research Center (US), Southwest Watershed Research Center (US), Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.