Modeling of a heat-integrated biomass downdraft gasifier: Estimating key model parameters using experimental data

Kinetic and transport parameters in a model of a heat-integrated biomass downdraft gasifier are poorly known and require estimation. The large number of parameters (40) arises from pyrolysis, combustion, and gasification reactions, as well as heat-transfer phenomena inside the gasifier and associated heat-integration system. Due to complexity of the model and the limited available data, only a subset of the parameters can be reliably estimated. A sensitivity-based approach is used to determine the appropriate number of parameters to estimate while preventing overfitting. It is hypothesized that estimating these important parameters will result in better model predictions. The 40 parameters are ranked from most-estimable to least-estimable based on sensitivity information and initial parameter uncertainties. A mean-squared-error criterion is then used to determine that 27 parameters should be estimated using data from 15 experimental runs, with the remaining 13 parameters fixed at their initial values. A diagnosis of the 13 low-ranked parameters reveals that 8 parameters are not estimated due to correlation with high-ranked parameters and that the remaining 5 parameters have little influence on model predictions. The model is validated using two runs not used for parameter tuning. The updated model is used to predict that a taller gasifier would not improve the quality of the producer gas. Simulations show that increasing the producer-gas demand by 50% results in a 15.2% decrease in H2/CO ratio, a 52.6% increase in tar content in the producer gas, and a 44% increase in electrical energy output.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119372
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling of a heat-integrated biomass downdraft gasifier: Estimating key model parameters using experimental data

Peter Gogolek, Anh‐Duong Dieu Vo, Kimberley B. McAuley, Samira Lotfi et al.
4 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.74
article

Modeling of a heat-integrated biomass downdraft gasifier: Estimating key model parameters using experimental data

Peter Gogolek, Anh‐Duong Dieu Vo, Kimberley B. McAuley, Samira Lotfi, James W. Butler, Houda M. Haidar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Kinetic and transport parameters in a model of a heat-integrated biomass downdraft gasifier are poorly known and require estimation. The large number of parameters (40) arises from pyrolysis, combustion, and gasification reactions, as well as heat-transfer phenomena inside the gasifier and associated heat-integration system. Due to complexity of the model and the limited available data, only a subset of the parameters can be reliably estimated. A sensitivity-based approach is used to determine the appropriate number of parameters to estimate while preventing overfitting. It is hypothesized that estimating these important parameters will result in better model predictions. The 40 parameters are ranked from most-estimable to least-estimable based on sensitivity information and initial parameter uncertainties. A mean-squared-error criterion is then used to determine that 27 parameters should be estimated using data from 15 experimental runs, with the remaining 13 parameters fixed at their initial values. A diagnosis of the 13 low-ranked parameters reveals that 8 parameters are not estimated due to correlation with high-ranked parameters and that the remaining 5 parameters have little influence on model predictions. The model is validated using two runs not used for parameter tuning. The updated model is used to predict that a taller gasifier would not improve the quality of the producer gas. Simulations show that increasing the producer-gas demand by 50% results in a 15.2% decrease in H2/CO ratio, a 52.6% increase in tar content in the producer gas, and a 44% increase in electrical energy output.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 325
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, National Research Council Canada, Natural Resources Canada
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.