Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China

Despite the abundant empirical evidence of higher education impacting emission mitigation, few studies have uncovered the mechanism that higher education affects climate policy. In this paper, we attempt to narrow the aforementioned research gap by employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the relations between the higher education expansion (HEE) and emission trading scheme (ETS) in China. The CGE model results show that the HEE reduces labor employment, GDP, and emissions, whereas the ETS relieves these HEE impacts. Regardless of the HEE, the ETS causes emission abatement at the price of employment loss and GDP loss, whereas the HEE weakens the ETS effects on employment, GDP, and emissions. These findings imply that HEE negatively affects emission mitigation in climate policy implementation, whereas climate policy could be implemented to boost economic growth during college education expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123699
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China

Shuyang Chen
6 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.78
article

Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China

Shuyang Chen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Despite the abundant empirical evidence of higher education impacting emission mitigation, few studies have uncovered the mechanism that higher education affects climate policy. In this paper, we attempt to narrow the aforementioned research gap by employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the relations between the higher education expansion (HEE) and emission trading scheme (ETS) in China. The CGE model results show that the HEE reduces labor employment, GDP, and emissions, whereas the ETS relieves these HEE impacts. Regardless of the HEE, the ETS causes emission abatement at the price of employment loss and GDP loss, whereas the HEE weakens the ETS effects on employment, GDP, and emissions. These findings imply that HEE negatively affects emission mitigation in climate policy implementation, whereas climate policy could be implemented to boost economic growth during college education expansion.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
South China University of Technology (CN)
National University's Basic Research Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China — Shuyang Chen · Journal of Environmental Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS