Efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine on postoperative gynecological surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine in gynecological postoperative follow-up. Methods: This study was conducted by using scientific databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, and PubMed) to search for randomized controlled studies comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine in gynecological surgery patients with postoperative outcomes. Results: Out of 236 articles, four articles were included for analysis. Dexmedetomidine reduced the VAS score in 2 h (MD -0.30, p=0.001), 12 h (MD -0.39, p=0.004), and 24 h (MD -0.15, p=0.03) after operation. Additionally, the combination of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine reduced the VAS score in 2 h (MD -‍0.70, p<0.001) and 12 h (MD -0.81, p=0.03) after the operation. Conclusion: Thus, dexmedetomidine was more potent in reducing postoperative pain after gynecological surgery compared to lidocaine. Furthermore, the combination of these regiments provided better outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56499/jppres23.1754_12.s1.4
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine on postoperative gynecological surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mentari Maratus Sholihah, Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin, Taufik Ridwan Hadi Kusuma, Azkia Rachmah
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine on postoperative gynecological surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mentari Maratus Sholihah, Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin, Taufik Ridwan Hadi Kusuma, Azkia Rachmah
article en

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine in gynecological postoperative follow-up. Methods: This study was conducted by using scientific databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, and PubMed) to search for randomized controlled studies comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine in gynecological surgery patients with postoperative outcomes. Results: Out of 236 articles, four articles were included for analysis. Dexmedetomidine reduced the VAS score in 2 h (MD -0.30, p=0.001), 12 h (MD -0.39, p=0.004), and 24 h (MD -0.15, p=0.03) after operation. Additionally, the combination of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine reduced the VAS score in 2 h (MD -‍0.70, p<0.001) and 12 h (MD -0.81, p=0.03) after the operation. Conclusion: Thus, dexmedetomidine was more potent in reducing postoperative pain after gynecological surgery compared to lidocaine. Furthermore, the combination of these regiments provided better outcomes.

Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy ResearchVol. 12(s1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.