Ideological Risks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Realistic Representations, Generative Mechanisms, and Response Logic

With the rapid development of AI technology, generative AI has triggered significant risks and challenges in the ideological field. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the real-life manifestations of these risks, including the problems of algorithmic control, data misdirection and content distortion, and explores their generative mechanisms, which are mainly attributed to the interpenetration of technology and power, the Western values of the designers, and the technological manipulation of capital. These risks may not only lead to the loss of discourse power and a crisis of value identity, but also exacerbate the confrontation and conflict between different ideologies, posing a threat to national political security and social stability. To cope with these risks, this paper proposes strategies such as strengthening regulation, shaping mainstream values, and enhancing the public's intelligent literacy, aiming to safeguard China's ideological security and promote the modernization of the system and capacity of ideological risk governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/rk2sqq83
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideological Risks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Realistic Representations, Generative Mechanisms, and Response Logic

Tongyang Zheng
2 citations
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
4.46
article

Ideological Risks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Realistic Representations, Generative Mechanisms, and Response Logic

Tongyang Zheng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With the rapid development of AI technology, generative AI has triggered significant risks and challenges in the ideological field. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the real-life manifestations of these risks, including the problems of algorithmic control, data misdirection and content distortion, and explores their generative mechanisms, which are mainly attributed to the interpenetration of technology and power, the Western values of the designers, and the technological manipulation of capital. These risks may not only lead to the loss of discourse power and a crisis of value identity, but also exacerbate the confrontation and conflict between different ideologies, posing a threat to national political security and social stability. To cope with these risks, this paper proposes strategies such as strengthening regulation, shaping mainstream values, and enhancing the public's intelligent literacy, aiming to safeguard China's ideological security and promote the modernization of the system and capacity of ideological risk governance.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 42
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ideological Risks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Realistic Representations, Generative Mechanisms, and Response Logic — Tongyang Zheng · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS