Divisive Mobilization and Democratic Collapse: Why Does Democratization Fail?

Democratic collapse refers to the regression of a democratic regime, meaning that the democratic system of a country is no longer stable. This phenomenon is usually caused by divisive mobilization or political conflicts, which are the consequences of the lack of certain social, economic or political conditions. Through qualitative research, this paper examines the previous political philosophy theories on democratic conditions and finds that previous theories often focus on citizens' sense of political participation. Later, this paper reviews the evolution of the definition of democracy in the history of political thought and concludes that democracy not only requires procedural elections and open and transparent policy-making, but also requires a certain degree of power check and balance to avoid the destruction of the democratic system by malicious rift mobilization. And this kind of check and balance requires the spirit of compromise of political participants. Finally, this paper conducts a comparative historical analysis of the democratization processes of Egypt and South Africa. This paper concludes that the stability of a country's democratic system depends on a culture that mixes obedience consciousness and political apathy, rather than just on citizens' sense of political participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/ygcewh93
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divisive Mobilization and Democratic Collapse: Why Does Democratization Fail?

Yinqi Liu
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
article

Divisive Mobilization and Democratic Collapse: Why Does Democratization Fail?

Yinqi Liu
article en

Abstract

Democratic collapse refers to the regression of a democratic regime, meaning that the democratic system of a country is no longer stable. This phenomenon is usually caused by divisive mobilization or political conflicts, which are the consequences of the lack of certain social, economic or political conditions. Through qualitative research, this paper examines the previous political philosophy theories on democratic conditions and finds that previous theories often focus on citizens' sense of political participation. Later, this paper reviews the evolution of the definition of democracy in the history of political thought and concludes that democracy not only requires procedural elections and open and transparent policy-making, but also requires a certain degree of power check and balance to avoid the destruction of the democratic system by malicious rift mobilization. And this kind of check and balance requires the spirit of compromise of political participants. Finally, this paper conducts a comparative historical analysis of the democratization processes of Egypt and South Africa. This paper concludes that the stability of a country's democratic system depends on a culture that mixes obedience consciousness and political apathy, rather than just on citizens' sense of political participation.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 42
Wuhan College (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.