Comparative evaluation of two dose-volume histogram prediction tools for treatment planning: Treatment planning quality and dose verification accuracy
RapidPlan was more effective at reducing OAR doses, whereas PlanIQ achieved better dose uniformity and lower plan complexity. Both tools performed similarly in terms of dose verification accuracy, with PlanIQ showing a slight advantage in dose-distribution matching. The choice of planning tool depends on the primary treatment goal, whether it is to reduce the OAR doses or improve the target dose uniformity.
Authors
- Yuji Nakaguchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-9921)
- Hitoshi Ikushima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-4293)
- Motoharu Sasaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-0287)
- Kanako Sakuragawa
- Shu‐ichi Nakano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9415-7014)
- Takeshi Kamomae (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7115-4822)
- Yuto Yamaji
Institutions
- Toyo Engineering (Japan) (JP)
- Tokushima University Hospital (JP)
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Tokushima University (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2024-12-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100297
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.61