Biomarker Panels for Predicting Progression of Kidney Disease in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

Key Points Clinical characteristics and biomarkers after hospital discharge can predict major adverse kidney events among AKI survivors. Clinical impact plots based on parsimonious prediction models illustrate the potential to optimize post-AKI care by identifying high-risk patients. Background AKI increases the risk of CKD. We aimed to identify combinations of clinical variables and biomarkers that predict long-term kidney disease risk after AKI. Methods We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of 723 hospitalized patients with AKI in the Assessment, Serial Evaluation, and Subsequent Sequelae of AKI study. Using machine learning, we investigated 75 candidate predictors including biomarkers measured at 3-month postdischarge follow-up to predict major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) within 3 years, defined as a decline in eGFR ≥40%, development of ESKD, or death. Results The mean age of study participants was 64±13 years, 68% were male, and 79% were of White race. Two hundred four patients (28%) developed MAKEs over 3 years of follow-up. Random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized regression models using all 75 predictors yielded area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.91) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.90), respectively. The most consistently selected predictors were albuminuria, soluble TNF receptor-1, and diuretic use. A parsimonious model using the top eight predictor variables showed similarly strong discrimination for MAKEs (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.90). Clinical impact utility analyses demonstrated that the eight-predictor model would have 55% higher efficiency of post-AKI care (number needed to screen/follow-up for a MAKE decreased from 3.55 to 1.97). For a kidney-specific outcome of eGFR decline or ESKD, a four-predictor model showed strong discrimination (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96). Conclusions Combining clinical data and biomarkers can accurately identify patients with high-risk AKI, enabling personalized post-AKI care and improved outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000622
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarker Panels for Predicting Progression of Kidney Disease in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

Heather Thiessen‐Philbrook, Kathleen F. Kerr, Alan S. Go, James S. Kaufman et al.
4 citations
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Acute Kidney Injury Research
1.36
article

Biomarker Panels for Predicting Progression of Kidney Disease in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

Heather Thiessen‐Philbrook, Kathleen F. Kerr, Alan S. Go, James S. Kaufman, Chirag R. Parikh, T. Alp İkizler, Dennis G. Moledina, Steven G. Coca, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Steven Menez, Si Cheng, Sherry G. Mansour, David Hu, Paul L. Kimmel
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Key Points Clinical characteristics and biomarkers after hospital discharge can predict major adverse kidney events among AKI survivors. Clinical impact plots based on parsimonious prediction models illustrate the potential to optimize post-AKI care by identifying high-risk patients. Background AKI increases the risk of CKD. We aimed to identify combinations of clinical variables and biomarkers that predict long-term kidney disease risk after AKI. Methods We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of 723 hospitalized patients with AKI in the Assessment, Serial Evaluation, and Subsequent Sequelae of AKI study. Using machine learning, we investigated 75 candidate predictors including biomarkers measured at 3-month postdischarge follow-up to predict major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) within 3 years, defined as a decline in eGFR ≥40%, development of ESKD, or death. Results The mean age of study participants was 64±13 years, 68% were male, and 79% were of White race. Two hundred four patients (28%) developed MAKEs over 3 years of follow-up. Random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized regression models using all 75 predictors yielded area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.91) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.90), respectively. The most consistently selected predictors were albuminuria, soluble TNF receptor-1, and diuretic use. A parsimonious model using the top eight predictor variables showed similarly strong discrimination for MAKEs (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.90). Clinical impact utility analyses demonstrated that the eight-predictor model would have 55% higher efficiency of post-AKI care (number needed to screen/follow-up for a MAKE decreased from 3.55 to 1.97). For a kidney-specific outcome of eGFR decline or ESKD, a four-predictor model showed strong discrimination (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96). Conclusions Combining clinical data and biomarkers can accurately identify patients with high-risk AKI, enabling personalized post-AKI care and improved outcomes.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 20(3)
National Institutes of Health (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US), Yale University (US), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), New York University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.