Preferred livestock interventions for small-scale farmers in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area: a demand-driven and participatory approach

In southern Africa, residents of Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs), devoted to biodiversity conservation and local development and well-being, practice small-scale farming in semi-arid environments constrained by the presence of protected areas and extensive wildlife/livestock/human interfaces that come with conflicts and opportunities. Under these contexts, livestock production aims at supporting local livelihoods despite the harsh semi-arid environment and conflicts with wildlife. In the context of an intervention aiming at promoting local development and the well-being of residents in the Great Limpopo TFCA, the objective of this study was to test a methodology to identify demand-driven interventions (i.e., based on local stakeholders’ needs) for improving livestock production in a communal land in Zimbabwe. This study used the outputs of an anticipatory scenario-building workshop (e.g., a desired future scenario for the area) and individual questionnaires to establish possible and desired livestock interventions by local stakeholders. Results were largely similar and complementary between the co-elaborative scenario building workshops and the questionnaire survey. Preferred interventions were: restocking herds with breeds adapted to local production; training in livestock practices and production; support to marketing; feed development and value addition; loan schemes to invest in livestock housing and stockfeed; and finally, animal health interventions to reduce the heavy disease burden. The individual questionnaire data specified preferred interventions for each domestic species. These demand-driven interventions provide a basis for future development projects in the area and avoid top-down approaches by development agencies that fail to address local needs and lack appropriation by local stakeholders necessary for the sustainability of the interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peer Community Journal
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.525
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferred livestock interventions for small-scale farmers in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area: a demand-driven and participatory approach

Robin Bourgeois, Venancio Edward Imbayarwo-Chikosi, Vimbai Gobvu, Alexandre Caron et al.
3 citations
Peer Community Journal
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
article

Preferred livestock interventions for small-scale farmers in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area: a demand-driven and participatory approach

Robin Bourgeois, Venancio Edward Imbayarwo-Chikosi, Vimbai Gobvu, Alexandre Caron, Prisca H. Mugabe, S. Ncube
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In southern Africa, residents of Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs), devoted to biodiversity conservation and local development and well-being, practice small-scale farming in semi-arid environments constrained by the presence of protected areas and extensive wildlife/livestock/human interfaces that come with conflicts and opportunities. Under these contexts, livestock production aims at supporting local livelihoods despite the harsh semi-arid environment and conflicts with wildlife. In the context of an intervention aiming at promoting local development and the well-being of residents in the Great Limpopo TFCA, the objective of this study was to test a methodology to identify demand-driven interventions (i.e., based on local stakeholders’ needs) for improving livestock production in a communal land in Zimbabwe. This study used the outputs of an anticipatory scenario-building workshop (e.g., a desired future scenario for the area) and individual questionnaires to establish possible and desired livestock interventions by local stakeholders. Results were largely similar and complementary between the co-elaborative scenario building workshops and the questionnaire survey. Preferred interventions were: restocking herds with breeds adapted to local production; training in livestock practices and production; support to marketing; feed development and value addition; loan schemes to invest in livestock housing and stockfeed; and finally, animal health interventions to reduce the heavy disease burden. The individual questionnaire data specified preferred interventions for each domestic species. These demand-driven interventions provide a basis for future development projects in the area and avoid top-down approaches by development agencies that fail to address local needs and lack appropriation by local stakeholders necessary for the sustainability of the interventions.

Peer Community JournalVol. 5
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Zimbabwe (ZW), Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), University of Eswatini (SZ), Agropolis International (FR), Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes (FR), Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement (FR), Fonctionnement et Conduite des Systèmes de Culture Tropicaux et Méditerranéens (FR), Forests and Societies (FR)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.