Research capacity strengthening methods and meanings: negotiating power in a global health programme on violence against women

Despite a strong commitment to addressing power imbalances through the RCS programme, progress was often hampered by the fact that these inequalities reflected broader structural issues in global health, as seen within Healthcare Responding to Violence and Abuse. The programme faced tensions between enhancing researchers' careers while building capacity under the current model, which sometimes conflicted with creating social value or challenging epistemic and normative structures. Participants clearly expressed concerns about power imbalances within the partnership and were keen to address them through the RCS programme. This led to a steep learning curve and significant adaptations within the RCS programme to navigate these issues within existing structural limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015376
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research capacity strengthening methods and meanings: negotiating power in a global health programme on violence against women

Claire Hawcroft, Evelina Rossi, Loraine Bacchus, Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira et al.
2 citations
BMJ Global Health
Global Health and Surgery
1.09
article

Research capacity strengthening methods and meanings: negotiating power in a global health programme on violence against women

Claire Hawcroft, Evelina Rossi, Loraine Bacchus, Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira, Sandi Dheensa, Heba Owda, Nerissa Tilouche, Beatriz Kalichman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite a strong commitment to addressing power imbalances through the RCS programme, progress was often hampered by the fact that these inequalities reflected broader structural issues in global health, as seen within Healthcare Responding to Violence and Abuse. The programme faced tensions between enhancing researchers' careers while building capacity under the current model, which sometimes conflicted with creating social value or challenging epistemic and normative structures. Participants clearly expressed concerns about power imbalances within the partnership and were keen to address them through the RCS programme. This led to a steep learning curve and significant adaptations within the RCS programme to navigate these issues within existing structural limitations.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 9(12)
An-Najah National University (PS), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Bristol (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Government of the United Kingdom, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Global Health and Surgery
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research capacity strengthening methods and meanings: negotiating power in a global health programme on violence against women — Claire Hawcroft, Evelina Rossi, et al. · BMJ Global Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS