Similar outcomes between HLA-haploid and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, retrospective study and severe aplastic anemia transplant-specific prognostic scoring system

In recent years, great progress has been made in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) treatment for hematological malignant diseases because of the advent of novel conditioning regimens, optimized graft manipulation, improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and advances in supportive care. Recent studies have shown very favorable outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients, with comparable outcomes to those of patients receiving immune suppressive therapy (IST) and allogeneic HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). However, most of the previous studies relied on single-center data analyses, and the conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care used were relatively singular. We do not know whether there are differences in the survival of SAA patients after haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT under conditions involving different transplant centers, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis. This is a disease-specific, multicenter and retrospective study. We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent haplo-HSCT or MSD-HSCT at four transplant centers in China. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.5% in the haplo-HSCT group and 89.7% in the MSD-HSCT group. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, incidence of graft versus host disease, and infection and graft failure rates were not significantly different between the groups. Haplo-HSCT achieved outcomes comparable to those of MSD-HSCT for SAA patients. According to the nomogram score, we developed a SAA prognostic scoring system. Haplo-HSCT should be considered an effective alternative for patients with SAA without a matched sibling donor. The SAA transplant-specific prognostic scoring system proposed in this study can conveniently predict the OS for SAA patients following MSD-HSCT or haplo-HSCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hematology
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06051-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similar outcomes between HLA-haploid and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, retrospective study and severe aplastic anemia transplant-specific prognostic scoring system

Shichun Gao, Jianchuan Deng, Yimei Feng, Lidan Zhu et al.
1 citations
Annals of Hematology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
0.45
article

Similar outcomes between HLA-haploid and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, retrospective study and severe aplastic anemia transplant-specific prognostic scoring system

Shichun Gao, Jianchuan Deng, Yimei Feng, Lidan Zhu, Mingyang Gao, Sanbin Wang, Huanfeng Liu, Jia Liu, Cheng Zhang, Ting Chen, Xi Zhang, Yanqi Zhang, Yuqing Liu, Lu Zhao, Han Yao, Lei Gao, Xiaobing Huang, Li Gao, Peiyan Kong, Lu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, great progress has been made in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) treatment for hematological malignant diseases because of the advent of novel conditioning regimens, optimized graft manipulation, improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and advances in supportive care. Recent studies have shown very favorable outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients, with comparable outcomes to those of patients receiving immune suppressive therapy (IST) and allogeneic HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). However, most of the previous studies relied on single-center data analyses, and the conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care used were relatively singular. We do not know whether there are differences in the survival of SAA patients after haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT under conditions involving different transplant centers, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis. This is a disease-specific, multicenter and retrospective study. We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent haplo-HSCT or MSD-HSCT at four transplant centers in China. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.5% in the haplo-HSCT group and 89.7% in the MSD-HSCT group. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, incidence of graft versus host disease, and infection and graft failure rates were not significantly different between the groups. Haplo-HSCT achieved outcomes comparable to those of MSD-HSCT for SAA patients. According to the nomogram score, we developed a SAA prognostic scoring system. Haplo-HSCT should be considered an effective alternative for patients with SAA without a matched sibling donor. The SAA transplant-specific prognostic scoring system proposed in this study can conveniently predict the OS for SAA patients following MSD-HSCT or haplo-HSCT.

Annals of HematologyVol. 104(1)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Army Medical University (CN), Dalian Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Xinqiao Hospital (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Army Medical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.