A NOVEL APPROACH TO LEGAL TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

This paper presents a novel approach to legal text summarization utilizing Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of summarizing complex legal documents. Traditional summarization techniques, including extractive and abstractive methods, often struggle to capture the nuances and intricacies of legal language, leading to summaries that may lack coherence or precision. The proposed DRL framework addresses these limitations by employing a policy network that dynamically selects relevant sentences and phrases from legal texts, guided by a reward function that evaluates summary quality based on accuracy, relevance, and coherence. Experimental results demonstrate that the DRL framework significantly outperforms existing summarization methods, providing legal professionals with concise, context-aware summaries that facilitate better decision-making and communication. The findings suggest that this innovative approach not only improves the quality of legal text summarization but also has broader implications for enhancing access to legal information and supporting informed public engagement with legal issues.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Science and International Relations Studies
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61784/jpsr3002
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A NOVEL APPROACH TO LEGAL TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Journal of Political Science and International Relations Studies
Topic Modeling
article

A NOVEL APPROACH TO LEGAL TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to legal text summarization utilizing Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of summarizing complex legal documents. Traditional summarization techniques, including extractive and abstractive methods, often struggle to capture the nuances and intricacies of legal language, leading to summaries that may lack coherence or precision. The proposed DRL framework addresses these limitations by employing a policy network that dynamically selects relevant sentences and phrases from legal texts, guided by a reward function that evaluates summary quality based on accuracy, relevance, and coherence. Experimental results demonstrate that the DRL framework significantly outperforms existing summarization methods, providing legal professionals with concise, context-aware summaries that facilitate better decision-making and communication. The findings suggest that this innovative approach not only improves the quality of legal text summarization but also has broader implications for enhancing access to legal information and supporting informed public engagement with legal issues.

Journal of Political Science and International Relations StudiesVol. 1(1)
Virginia Tech (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.