A Study of Mainstream Malaysian Media’s Attitude and Its Changes on China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis (2018-2023)

The period of 2018 to 2023 saw both four changes in the Malaysian government and a geopolitical game between great powers in the Asian-Pacific region. Especially, 2020 saw both change in the Malaysian government as well as the outbreak of COVID-19—inevitably affecting Malaysia’s attitude towards the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) both politically and economically. Hence, this study collects BRI reports from the mainstream Malaysian media—New Straits Times (NST)—from 2018 to 2023. Using corpus-based critical discourse analysis as the research framework, this study builds two target corpora for the periods of 2018-2019 and 2020-2023, respectively. Through comparative analysis of the reports amount, thematic terms, and concordance lines, this study examines NST’s attitude towards the BRI and changes of attitude. The research findings firstly indicate a dynamic upward trend in NST’s coverage of the BRI; secondly, the content of NST’s reports shows a trend of diversification; and thirdly, while it expresses concerns about issues such as China’s rise and challenges to security in the Southeast Asian region, NST’s attitude towards the BRI remains positive overall, with no significant changes. This study explores Malaysia’s attitudes towards the BRI from the perspective of news discourse analysis—providing both a perspective for enhancing mutual understanding between China and Malaysia, and further understanding of the status of China-Malaysia cooperation under the BRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n2p274
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Mainstream Malaysian Media’s Attitude and Its Changes on China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis (2018-2023)

Zalina Mohamad Kasim, Minli Huang, Abdul Manaf Ali
4 citations
World Journal of English Language
Asian Studies and History
4.53
article

A Study of Mainstream Malaysian Media’s Attitude and Its Changes on China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis (2018-2023)

Zalina Mohamad Kasim, Minli Huang, Abdul Manaf Ali
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The period of 2018 to 2023 saw both four changes in the Malaysian government and a geopolitical game between great powers in the Asian-Pacific region. Especially, 2020 saw both change in the Malaysian government as well as the outbreak of COVID-19—inevitably affecting Malaysia’s attitude towards the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) both politically and economically. Hence, this study collects BRI reports from the mainstream Malaysian media—New Straits Times (NST)—from 2018 to 2023. Using corpus-based critical discourse analysis as the research framework, this study builds two target corpora for the periods of 2018-2019 and 2020-2023, respectively. Through comparative analysis of the reports amount, thematic terms, and concordance lines, this study examines NST’s attitude towards the BRI and changes of attitude. The research findings firstly indicate a dynamic upward trend in NST’s coverage of the BRI; secondly, the content of NST’s reports shows a trend of diversification; and thirdly, while it expresses concerns about issues such as China’s rise and challenges to security in the Southeast Asian region, NST’s attitude towards the BRI remains positive overall, with no significant changes. This study explores Malaysia’s attitudes towards the BRI from the perspective of news discourse analysis—providing both a perspective for enhancing mutual understanding between China and Malaysia, and further understanding of the status of China-Malaysia cooperation under the BRI.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 15(2)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Asian Studies and History
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.