Lexical Cohesion in English-Chinese Business Translation: Human Translators Versus ChatGPT

Lexical cohesion involves the continuity of text on the level of lexis achieved through word choices; it embodies repetition, synonymy, and collocation (Halliday, 1985). This study attempts to elucidate the lexical cohesion and examine translation shifts in the English-Chinese translation of business texts. The English business texts are compared with two Chinese translations: one by human translators and the other by ChatGPT. The research is based on Halliday’s (1985) cohesion and Toury’s (2012) descriptive translation studies. The data of lexical cohesion are identified and collected manually in a parallel corpus. The analysis deals with the description of lexical cohesion and translation shifts. The research reveals that semantic meanings of the items of lexical cohesion are largely maintained in the English-Chinese business translation. Additionally, despite using translation methods like literal translation, addition, omission, and conversion in translating lexical cohesion, human translators make more translation shifts of lexical cohesion than ChatGPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n2p286
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lexical Cohesion in English-Chinese Business Translation: Human Translators Versus ChatGPT

Mohamed Abdou Moindjie, Na Tang
World Journal of English Language
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Lexical Cohesion in English-Chinese Business Translation: Human Translators Versus ChatGPT

Mohamed Abdou Moindjie, Na Tang
article en

Abstract

Lexical cohesion involves the continuity of text on the level of lexis achieved through word choices; it embodies repetition, synonymy, and collocation (Halliday, 1985). This study attempts to elucidate the lexical cohesion and examine translation shifts in the English-Chinese translation of business texts. The English business texts are compared with two Chinese translations: one by human translators and the other by ChatGPT. The research is based on Halliday’s (1985) cohesion and Toury’s (2012) descriptive translation studies. The data of lexical cohesion are identified and collected manually in a parallel corpus. The analysis deals with the description of lexical cohesion and translation shifts. The research reveals that semantic meanings of the items of lexical cohesion are largely maintained in the English-Chinese business translation. Additionally, despite using translation methods like literal translation, addition, omission, and conversion in translating lexical cohesion, human translators make more translation shifts of lexical cohesion than ChatGPT.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 15(2)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lexical Cohesion in English-Chinese Business Translation: Human Translators Versus ChatGPT — Mohamed Abdou Moindjie, Na Tang · World Journal of English Language (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS