Is Mediation a Scientific Discipline? Theoretical and Practical Perspectives

ABSTRACT The main objective of this study is to determine whether mediation is regarded as an autonomous discipline from both academic and professional standpoints. To achieve this, the study initially conducted a review of the most recent literature on the subject, followed by gathering opinions from experts, professionals, and trainers across eight different countries through in‐depth interviews and discussion groups. Among the primary findings of the research, it becomes apparent that while mediation remains a relatively underexplored topic, existing literature suggests that it possesses elements to assert its status as a scientific discipline, evidenced by its own axioms, paradigms, models, and methodologies. However, the professionals and experts consulted contend that it falls short of being classified as such. They cite several challenges, including the scarcity of real cases for investigation, the disconnect between theory and professional application, and the need for enhanced quality in scientific research to surmount the stagnation it has encountered for years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21459
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Mediation a Scientific Discipline? Theoretical and Practical Perspectives

Andrés Arias Astray, Marta Blanco Carrasco, Jorge Manuel Leitão Ferreira
2 citations
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Management and Negotiation
2.26
article

Is Mediation a Scientific Discipline? Theoretical and Practical Perspectives

Andrés Arias Astray, Marta Blanco Carrasco, Jorge Manuel Leitão Ferreira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The main objective of this study is to determine whether mediation is regarded as an autonomous discipline from both academic and professional standpoints. To achieve this, the study initially conducted a review of the most recent literature on the subject, followed by gathering opinions from experts, professionals, and trainers across eight different countries through in‐depth interviews and discussion groups. Among the primary findings of the research, it becomes apparent that while mediation remains a relatively underexplored topic, existing literature suggests that it possesses elements to assert its status as a scientific discipline, evidenced by its own axioms, paradigms, models, and methodologies. However, the professionals and experts consulted contend that it falls short of being classified as such. They cite several challenges, including the scarcity of real cases for investigation, the disconnect between theory and professional application, and the need for enhanced quality in scientific research to surmount the stagnation it has encountered for years.

Conflict Resolution QuarterlyVol. 42(3)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.