Pacific Islander and Māori Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment in Australia

Pacific Islander and Māori people are overrepresented in the Australian criminal justice system. However, little research has examined relevant risk and protective factors and whether existing risk tools are appropriate for predicting risk and informing treatment for these populations. This paper used a qualitative, thematic analytical approach to canvass the opinions of Māori and Pacific Islander justice workers regarding risk and protective factors, the perceived suitability of the Level of Service/Risk Need Responsivity (LS/RNR) and best-practice approaches to engaging in a risk assessment interview with Pacific Islander and Māori people. Findings suggest that while many of the LS/RNR risk factors are likely to be relevant, there may be several culturally specific risk and protective factors that are not included in the LS/RNR. Consequently, the LS/RNR may not comprehensively assess the risks and needs of Pacific Islander and Māori people and may present some limitations in its capacity to inform treatment and management. Recommendations for practitioners and organizations and avenues for future research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013241301100
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pacific Islander and Māori Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment in Australia

Stephane M. Shepherd, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Natasha Maharaj, Samantha Venner
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Pacific Islander and Māori Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment in Australia

Stephane M. Shepherd, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Natasha Maharaj, Samantha Venner
article en

Abstract

Pacific Islander and Māori people are overrepresented in the Australian criminal justice system. However, little research has examined relevant risk and protective factors and whether existing risk tools are appropriate for predicting risk and informing treatment for these populations. This paper used a qualitative, thematic analytical approach to canvass the opinions of Māori and Pacific Islander justice workers regarding risk and protective factors, the perceived suitability of the Level of Service/Risk Need Responsivity (LS/RNR) and best-practice approaches to engaging in a risk assessment interview with Pacific Islander and Māori people. Findings suggest that while many of the LS/RNR risk factors are likely to be relevant, there may be several culturally specific risk and protective factors that are not included in the LS/RNR. Consequently, the LS/RNR may not comprehensively assess the risks and needs of Pacific Islander and Māori people and may present some limitations in its capacity to inform treatment and management. Recommendations for practitioners and organizations and avenues for future research are discussed.

International Journal of Forensic Mental HealthVol. 24(1)
Deakin University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Australian Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.