Pay for Delay to Prevent Market Entry of a Generic Manufacturer

The phenomenon of reverse payments, which is common in the pharmaceutical industry, is relatively unpopular in other industries because of antitrust-related legal issues in various countries. In this study, we first examine a basic model with one original and one generic manufacturer, in which the original manufacturer may propose pay for delaying (P4D) entry of the generic manufacturer. We show that the original and generic manufacturers have incentives to engage in P4D, and when doing so, consumer surplus and social welfare always decline. Next, we add another original manufacturer to the basic model. If this manufacturer is a domestic firm, P4D will increase social welfare if drugs are close to homogeneous products and the additional manufacturer is efficient. However, if this manufacturer is a foreign firm, P4D will always reduce social welfare. These results suggest the need to consider whether the drug market is internationalized when deciding whether to regulate P4D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Economic Journal
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2024.2439444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pay for Delay to Prevent Market Entry of a Generic Manufacturer

Hui Xu
1 citations
International Economic Journal
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
0.53
article

Pay for Delay to Prevent Market Entry of a Generic Manufacturer

Hui Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The phenomenon of reverse payments, which is common in the pharmaceutical industry, is relatively unpopular in other industries because of antitrust-related legal issues in various countries. In this study, we first examine a basic model with one original and one generic manufacturer, in which the original manufacturer may propose pay for delaying (P4D) entry of the generic manufacturer. We show that the original and generic manufacturers have incentives to engage in P4D, and when doing so, consumer surplus and social welfare always decline. Next, we add another original manufacturer to the basic model. If this manufacturer is a domestic firm, P4D will increase social welfare if drugs are close to homogeneous products and the additional manufacturer is efficient. However, if this manufacturer is a foreign firm, P4D will always reduce social welfare. These results suggest the need to consider whether the drug market is internationalized when deciding whether to regulate P4D.

International Economic JournalVol. 39(1)
Kobe University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.